Scientific Committee to Evaluate PseudoSkeptic Criticism of the Paranormal
Hello everyone
56 posts
• Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: Hello everyone
Scepcop,
"I don't think Chris or anyone has all the answers. There are too many unanswered questions and inconsistencies." I don't have any of the answers and neither does anybody else, least of all CIT.  I have been saying that this endless debate is a frikin waste of time but nobody seems to catch on. Y'all keep running in circles. Hey, whatever blows your skirt up. 
Re: Hello everyone
"I think Eteponge's Blog is a pretty cool guy. eh debates Skeptics and doesnt afraid of anything."
Re: Hello everyone
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
Re: Hello everyone
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
Re: Hello everyone
Chris, have you seen this video making fun of the CIT? What do you think of it?
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
Re: Hello everyone
Chris, ProfWag,
What did this black cab driver mean at the end in his confession? “Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
Re: Hello everyone
I didn't think the mock trailer video was all that good. I agree that there is no way a plane could fly over the Pentagon and not be reported by many people but I will NOT argue the point because I have a more important point that I would like you to address.
There is NO PROOF that the plane flew over the Pentagon. Lloyd was a pawn and like most people involved, he had no idea what was going on until it happened. The plane could have been on the south path and flown above the light poles so the fact that they were staged has nothing to do with whether or not the plane hit the Pentagon. All this is misdirection. Endless bickering about the witnesses and total avoidance of the final conclusion which is false. I have answered your questions now please address the most important point. The so called "proof of flyover" is that a plane on the north flight path could not cause the directional damage (leading to and including the hole in the “C” ring). However, the flyover theory assumes the directional damage was caused by something other than the plane, such as explosives. If the directional damage was caused by something else in the flyover theory then it could be caused by something else if the plane hit the Pentagon. The directional damage has nothing to do with whether or not the plane hit, and it does not prove that a plane on the north path did not hit the Pentagon. The North of Citgo flight path does not prove flyover.
Re: Hello everyone
Soooooooo Scepcop, you're saying that the lightpole and damage to the taxi was staged to be done AFTER the plane hit, in broad daylight, in full view of everyone stuck in the traffic jam?
56 posts
• Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests |
|
