Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page
Debunking Christian Circular Arguments and Assumptions
Debunking the Main Arguments
Here are the most
popular
reasons that Christians give to try to prove the validity of their
religion and
Bible. They were formulated by apologists, evangelists, and
writers to
defend the believers’ faith and try to provide reasons for a
solid foundation
for it. On the surface, to someone with little or only a
cursory
knowledge of Christianity, they may sound like they make
sense. However,
to those who know the full uncensored version of history and
Christianity, they
just don’t hold water at all. They are very easy to
debunk, unless your
mind is captive to fanaticism and doctrine. All you need are
a broad
perspective, good reasoning skills, common sense, and knowledge of the
facts.
Ok let’s
begin
now. For
reference sake, I will number each of the arguments I critique and
refute. Also, when I quote Bible verses, they will mostly be
from the
King James Version, unless the passage is not very readable, in which
case I
may use another version such as the New International
Version.
Argument #
1: The
Bible is the Infallible Word
of God.
This is the first
and most
fundamental claim that Christians make when Evangelizing. It
is just
taken for granted that it is true, but if you analyze the weight of the
evidence
for this doctrine, you find that it is in actuality both weak and
nearly
non-existent. First of all, the first sentence of this
argument, that the
“Bible is the word of God” implies that the text in
the Bible books are God’s
words verbatim. However, we all know, including the
Christians, that
humans wrote those books. The only difference is that
Christians believe
that the humans (the identity of many of them are unknown) who wrote
the Bible
were guided by God the Holy Spirit, and therefore, they are
God’s words
verbatim and without flaw. The question then becomes, were
they?
Furthermore, they argue that since we would assume that God would
protect his
own word, that the Bible has remain unchanged.
Now these are huge assumptions for one thing. It would take A LOT to prove or even demonstrate such outlandish claims literally. However, not only do Christian Evangelists make these assumptions, but they just assume it to be true as well without any real basis. In general, the issue is not questioned or analyzed in the church as to whether the Bible is God’s word or not. It is simply ASSUMED to be so. It’s a GIVEN. And it rests on a very shaky foundation, much more so than they could imagine. What most Christians don't realize and never think about is that God himself never actually told them directly that the Bible was his word. Fallible imperfect human beings did!
To demonstrate
this, here's
an interesting and simple test that you can try. Go to a
church,
and ask ten people the question "How do you know that the
Bible is
God's word?" From most of them you'll get a look of confusion
or
puzzlement, and some of them will just say "Because it says so."
offering no other reason. Of course, a few more knowledgeable
ones will
use some of the arguments in this book that I refute. But
what you can
learn from this experiment is that most Christians don't know why they
should
believe that the Bible is God's word. You see, they've been
socially and
psychologically engineered to assume that it's a given fact that it
is.
They've been unconsciously taught that it's a simple fact just like the
sky is
blue and the grass is green. That's why in their normal line
of thinking
they would never question why they should believe that the Bible is
God's word.
You may wonder why
Christians
never questioned the inspiration of the Bible upon first being
introduced to
it. Well I think that one of the main reasons they don't
question the
Bible's divine inspiration upon their initial conversion into
Christianity is
due to the incredible promise of eternal life that they are promised
upon
conversion. They are so overjoyed and amazed at the offer of
eternal life
in heaven, offered to them for free just for believing, that their left
brain
never stops to analyze what they've been preached. Another
reason is that
preachers and evangelists often use sentiment, emotion and touching
stories to
convert people, rather than reason. Or if they were raised by
Christian
families, then of course as a child they wouldn't initially question
their
religious theology, since children generally assume that what their
parents
tell them is true.
Now, here’s
the
big
shocker. What followers of Christian fundamentalists
don’t know and never
realize is: NOWHERE in
the Bible does it claim that all 66 books are
God’s word or infallible. The
doctrine of Biblical inspiration and
infallibility was made up by Christian fundamentalists to create an
artificial
foundation for their faith. Fundamentalists love to cite 2
Timothy 3:16;
however, the “Scriptures” referred to in that verse
refer to the Old Testament,
and the term “inspiration” does not mean
“word of God” either. (i.e. if a tree
inspires me to write a poem about it, are they my words or the
tree’s
words?)
In any case, the
Bible
itself
does NOT even claim that all 66 books in it are infallible.
Nowhere.
Period. That’s something Christians say, not the
Bible or God. In
fact, many of the authors of the Bible had no idea that their books
would be
canonized into an “infallible word of God”
book. Even in Paul’s epistles,
he made it clear that he was writing personal letters, not dictating
infallible
words from God. He even says literally in three verses in his
epistles
that these are his words, and not God’s! (see the examples
below)
But even if the
Bible did
claim to be God’s word or infallible, that wouldn’t
make it so either. I
could take any of the millions of books in the world, and write in
somewhere,
“This book is the word of God. It is
infallible.” But would that make it
so?
There are two vague
verses
though, that Christians use to attempt to prove that the Bible is
God’s
word. These two verses though, pose problems and raise more
questions
that preachers don’t address, cause they
can’t. Let’s look at them
now. Here’s the first one.
2
Timothy 3:16
"All
scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for
doctrine, for
reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness."
1) First of all,
the term
"All Scripture" could easily and logically refer to the Old Testament
or the Ten Commandments because a) Jesus used the word scripture many
times to
refer to the Old Testament canons, so to be consistent we must assume
that here
as well, and b) at the time this verse was written, the New Testament
as we
have it today was not even put together yet! Now, since
modern
Evangelical Christian theology is based mainly on the teachings of the
New
Testament of course, that means that this verse doesn’t
really support the core
Christian theological teachings of today!
2) Second, just
because
someone was “inspired” by something to write does
not mean that that which
caused the inspiration wrote it directly verbatim.
That’s not what the
word “inspiration” even means. For
example, if a beautiful sunset
inspired me to write a poem, that doesn't mean that the sunset itself
wrote the
poem, only that the sunset motivated me to write it. The
definition of
the word “inspire” obviously is not that the
“inspirer” is dictating their
words verbatim as if it were their own. Here is the
definition of
“inspire” from the American
Heritage Dictionary:
1. To
affect, guide, or arouse by divine
influence.
2.
To fill with enlivening or exalting emotion: hymns
that inspire
the congregation; an artist who was inspired by Impressionism.
3a.
To stimulate to action; motivate: a
sales force that was inspired
by the prospect of a bonus. b.
To affect or touch: The
falling
leaves inspired her with sadness.
4.
To draw forth; elicit or arouse: a
teacher who inspired admiration
and respect.
5.
To be the cause or source of; bring about: an
invention that
inspired many imitations.
6.
To draw in (air) by inhaling.
7.
Archaic
a.
To breathe on. b.
To breathe life
into.
3) Third, no matter
what
this
verse referred to, one verse out of over 33,000 Bible verses does not
make all
the verses divinely inspired, especially the verses of the other books
of the
Bible which don’t always even agree with each
other. So the idea of one
verse out of one book proving divinity in all 66 books is completely
absurd and
non-sensical. And as we know, words are just that -
words. They don’t
create reality or fact. Therefore, just because a verse like
this implies
that the Bible is the word of God doesn’t make the whole
Bible the word of
God. In fact, the majority of the books of the Bible do not
even claim to
be the word of God. Not even Paul claimed that his letters
and epistles
were the word of God. But nevertheless, even if hundreds or
thousands of
verses in the Bible said that they were the word of God, that still
wouldn’t
make it so either. I could take any book in the world, and
pen in them
somewhere the words, “All words in this book are given by
inspiration of
God…..” but would that make them God’s
infallible word?!
Although the Bible
claims to
contain the words of God when it says "The Lord spoke" or "Thus
sayeth the Lord", even if God really did say those things, that doesn't
mean that when Paul said "I say" this and that, that it is the same
thing. Nor does it mean that all the verses where God speaks
directly
reflect what he actually said either.
Now, here’s
the
other verse
they use to claim divine inspiration of the Bible.
2
Peter 1: 20-21
“Knowing
this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private
interpretation. For the prophecy came not in old time by the
will of man:
but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy
Ghost.”
Again, it obviously
is
referring to the prophecies of Old Testament prophets and perhaps
scriptures,
not to the whole Bible. Therefore, the three problems above
apply to this
verse as well. And as mentioned, Christian theology and
teaching is based
primarily on the Church’s interpretation of the New Testament.
Three verses
that say the
Bible is NOT the word of God
Now, here’s
the
kicker.
There are THREE verses in the New Testament that claim that the Bible
is NOT
the exact word of God! Here let me show you!
1 Corinthians
7:12
"But
to the rest speak I, not the
Lord: If any brother
hath a wife that
believeth not, and she be pleased to dwell with him, let him not put
her
away."
The Apostle Paul
clearly
says
here in the first sentence "speak I, NOT the Lord". He is
saying that these words he is about to say are from him and not
God! It’s
in plain language. This alone technically invalidates the
fundamentalist
doctrine that every word in the Bible is uttered directly by
God. It
alone shatters this absolute claim of theirs. There is no
defense.
However, there are two more similar verses like it to shatter the
doctrine even
further beyond what’s necessary. Later on in the
same chapter, Paul says:
1
Corinthians 7:25
"Now
concerning virgins I have no
commandment of the
Lord: yet I give my
judgment, as one that hath
obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful."
You see here how
Paul is
saying that he is using his best personal judgment, and that what he's
saying
is not directly from God? He is telling you that he is
writing his own
opinion. Then, in Paul’s next letter to the
Corinthians, he says:
2
Corinthians 11:17
"That
which I speak, I speak it not
after the Lord, but as it were
foolishly,
in this confidence of boasting."
Again, the same
claim by
Paul.
Christian
apologists, when
countered with these verses, usually respond by claiming either that:
1) Paul was adding
to Jesus'
commands, or
2) Paul was being
inspired
without himself knowing it.
Now those are very
bizarre
explanations
indeed, which don’t even address this issue. Either
way, even if those
two explanations are true, they still shatter the doctrine of Biblical
infallibility. And furthermore, in regards to the second
explanation, why
would God "inspire" Paul to say that his words were NOT from
God?!
Now add up the
score.
ONE verse versus THREE! This extreme doctrine is shattered
three times
over. It’s been disproven by 300 percent!
Game over.
In addition, all
one has to
do is to take a look at the opening line of the epistles in the New
Testament
by Paul and other writers, and you will easily notice that the author
is
addressing his “letter” to a specific church or
group of people at the
time. This means that it is obvious in clear language that
they were
writing a letter for certain people or congregations, to either
instruct them
or give them encouragement, and not writing some infallible scriptures
to be
placed in a Bible to represent God’s word verbatim to all
mankind!
What is odd is that
while
the
Evangelists and Apologists emphasize this doctrine of Biblical
infallibility so
strongly and obsessively as if it were the central issue, the Bible
itself
doesn’t even do that. In fact, these Apologists
only have two vague
verses they use to justify this core doctrine of theirs. If
this doctrine
of Biblical infallibility was so central and core to Christianity as
they
claim, then why are there only two vague verses about it, out of over
33,000?
As mentioned
before, the
doctrine of Biblical infallibility was not a central tenet of
Christianity
until early in the 20th
century when the theory of evolution began
to be taught as fact in classrooms. It was then that the
Christians
countered with this doctrine. Not only did it protect
Christian tenets
from the danger of Darwinist teachings, but it served other purposes as
well. You see, without the doctrine that the Bible is
infallible and that
every word of it is of God, it would put question marks on every
verse.
Anyone could then pick and choose which parts of it they wanted to be
God’s
word and which they didn’t, and that would greatly undermine
the authority of
it. So this doctrine is necessary to keep the religion
intact.
Otherwise, Christians themselves would not be able to feel secure and
confident
that every verse in the Bible could be trusted.
For eloquent
dissertations
about the Bible, see the following articles:
About
the Holy Bible (1894) by Robert Ingersoll, a religious critic from
the 19th
century.
Some
Mistakes Of Moses (1879) by Robert Ingersoll. An extensive article
by
Ingersoll that lists discrepancies and absurdities in the books of
Moses.
The
Age of Reason by Thomas Paine, a great eloquent religious critic
and
freethinker.
The
Argument from the Bible (1996) by Theodore
Drange.
Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page