Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page
Debunking Christian Circular Arguments and Assumptions
Argument # 12: Christianity
is not a religion. It is
a
personal relationship with God.
To set Christianity
apart
from other religions, some like to use this line when witnessing to
others. They will say that Christianity is not a religion in
the
dictionary sense that involves a system of impersonal rites, rituals
and
worship to an abstract impersonal deity. But rather, it
involves a
personal one-one-one relationship with Jesus Christ. And
that’s what
makes it special because you are having a personal relationship with a
living
being.
However, if you
look at the
American Heritage Dictionary definition for
“religion”:
1a. Belief in and reverence
for a supernatural power or
powers regarded as creator and governor of the universe. b.
A personal
or institutionalized system grounded in such belief and worship.
2.
The life or condition of a person in a religious order.
3.
A set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a
spiritual leader.
4.
A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious
devotion.
You will see that
mainstream
Christianity as it is believed and practiced certainly falls into these
definitions. They believe in a supernatural power, that he has
rules and
commandments, has passed down a holy book, demands worship and praise
and
obedience, expects you to try to convert others, etc. This argument is
a mere attempt
to make Christianity stand out from the rest and appear special.
However,
consider the following:
1) Almost every
religion tries to set itself
apart from the rest and from the common definition of the word
“religion” in
some way. For example, Buddhists explain that Buddhism is not
a religion,
because
http://www.buddhistinformation.com/path_to_true_happiness.htm
“Buddhism
is not a religion because, first, the Buddha is not a "supernatural
being
power." The Buddha is simply a person who has reached
Complete Understanding
of the reality of life and the universe… Second,
Buddhism is not a religion
because "belief" in the Buddha’s teachings is not blind
belief, blind
faith and far from superstition. Buddha Shakyamuni
taught us not to blindly believe what he told us, he wants us to try
the
teachings and prove them for ourselves. The Buddha wants us to know not
merely
believe… Third, Buddhism is not a religion
because all the "rites and
celebrations" are not centered on a supernatural being, but rather on
the
people attending the assemblies… Finally,
Buddhism is not a religion because
the "devotion" used in Buddhism is not one based on emotion, but one
based on reason.”
Likewise, even cults such as
Scientology have made the
claim that it is not a religion but “an applied religious
philosophy” (http://www.holysmoke.org/cos/religion-not.htm).
Buddhists have cited
one interesting difference between their religion and Christianity that
is
worth noting here. One Buddhist thinker remarked
“The difference between
Buddha and the founders of other religions such as Jesus,
is that even if the Buddha never existed, what he said would still be
true.” Now, that’s huge.
It’s saying that even without the
historicity of Buddha, the teachings of the religion, regardless of its
originator, that deal with the human mind, attachment, suffering,
karma,
meditation, etc. would still be true. And remember that
Buddhism in its
basic untainted form makes no claims about deities or
theology. Instead,
it is about liberating your own mind from attachment, suffering or
karma, and
putting meditation techniques into practice, without requiring belief
in any
doctrine or theology. However, you definitely cannot say that
about Jesus
and Christianity. Without the historicity of Jesus (whose
existence is
still questionable as mentioned in earlier sections) the Gospel of
Christianity
would fall flat on its face and be rendered completely inept and
powerless.
That is the weakness of Christianity which the Christians must
constantly
believe and develop extreme doctrines/teachings for in order to
maintain their
confidence and security in it.
2) I could also
use the New Age or metaphysical
paradigm of reality which is pantheistic/monistic (everything is part
of God
theory) in nature to say that I have an even deeper connection with God
than
the Christian does. You see, in the pantheist’s
view, everything is God,
or all is one. Therefore, there is no separation or duality
with
God. In other words, God and you are not two separate beings
at the
quantum or spiritual level. Duality and separateness between
the self and
all objects of creation is an illusion at the macro level.
(See Michael
Talbot’s The
Holographic Universe)
When one is able to transcend the dual state of
mind, one sees that the separation between themselves and others and
God is all
an illusion. Therefore, I can argue that Christianity
involves a sense of
duality “relationship” with God which puts you at a
less evolved state of mind,
while the mystical consciousness transcends this and eliminates the
illusion of
separation and duality with God. An article in the Times of
India put
this idea well:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/msid-1390854,curpg-5.cms
“But if
God is truly all that is, what can possibly make one of his
names more powerful than any other? For that matter, what is the
purpose of naming him (or her or it) in the first place? Naming
anything creates a subject/object relationship between you and the
thing named, and that in itself means a separation.
Every name of God, no matter how holy, drives a wedge between the
creator and the created
? which
includes you and me. This separation is
the primal breeding ground for fear, for we then see ourselves as tiny
beings, abandoned and living on the fringe of an incomprehensibly huge
cosmos.”
Also, here is a mystic
on my list giving her take on it:
“I
say to those people... I agree that Jesus IS... the ONE and
the Way
BUT... What IS being
referenced here by
the words... "The ONE"
????... Jesus'
physical form? NO....
not even close. He
is referencing
"The Christ" or The Pure Consciousness within, which everything
is. We are ALL The
ONE. But Jesus had
attained that Supreme Knowledge... via Grace... whereas most have
not.”
3) If you look at what it involves,
this
“relationship” with God / Jesus Christ is indeed an odd
one. In it, a Christian
is supposed to obey God without question. He/she does NOT have the
freedom to
disagree or hold opinions contrary to Bible teaching. This means
that
he/she cannot say to God, “I love you God. But I don’t
agree with what you
said in the Bible here and here…” To do so would mean
he/she was not a true
Christian, and the church would not accept such an opinion
either. Instead,
any believer disagreeing with God or parts of the Bible in ANY issue
would be
encouraged or lectured to submit and acknowledge that God’s
opinions/ways are
perfect, righteous, and therefore there is no disagreeing with it, and
to do so
is morally wrong.
So, to have a
relationship
with God, a Christian must agree with him and obey everything in the
Bible.
This means that you are not allowed the freedom to have your own
opinions or to
think for yourself! (Obviously, the Bible does not honor your First
Amendment
Rights) What kind of a relationship is that? Would you want a
relationship or
even friendship with someone that required you to obey and agree with
everything they said? In our society, we consider that to be an
unhealthy
relationship. In fact, that is more like a master/servant or
dictator/pawn type
of relationship. And it’s one where you cannot even both
respectfully
disagree. Is that what you would call a great relationship?
4) Finally,
what kind of relationship can you have with someone you can’t
see, touch or
hear? Isn’t that kind of delusional when you think about it? Why
can’t God or
Jesus appear to those who have a relationship with him? Why all this
hiding? It
doesn’t make sense.
Besides,
how are you supposed to know what God wants you to do if he never talks
to you
or appears before you? I’m not talking about basic moral
commandments. I’m
talking about specific things in YOUR life that he wants you to do, or
specific
decisions. This never made any sense to me when I was a Christian. You
were
told to surrender your life to Jesus Christ and let him take over. And
you were
told to seek God's will in everything you do. But how are you supposed to
surrender yourself to God and do his will when you have no idea at all
what his
will is for the daily issues and decisions you go through?
Although
Christians say that every problem and situation has a solution in the
Bible,
that just isn’t so with regard to decisions in daily life. For
example, suppose
I were facing decisions such as: which class to take, which job to
take, what
to study in college, which house to buy, where to move to, etc. How
would I
know what God's will is? I could pray and ask, but I
wouldn’t get a clear
direct unambiguous answer like I would from a person in real
life. I could
pray for signs and omens, but you can pretty much read signs and omens
out of
anything, even the most trivial things. Therefore, it is too
inconclusive to
rely on. Furthermore, you could get signs and omens supporting
both
decisions as well.
I
could try to be filled with the Holy Spirit and see if it would move me
toward
one of the decisions. But here’s what would happen. At
first, I would feel
the Holy Spirit move me toward one decision and I'll think “that
must be
it!” Then, later I'll have doubts about it and feel moved
toward the
other decision. After a while, I would be wondering why the Holy
Spirit
would be moving me in different directions, as though it kept changing
its
mind. Eventually, I would get frustrated and confused and say,
“What the
heck.” So you see, I would have no way to know what God’s
will is. There’s
simply no sure way to tell.
Another
big problem I had was this: How could you live a holy Christian life
separate
from the secular sinful world, while at the same time be physically in
this
world and exposed daily to its influences and people? Such leads
to
inevitable clashes and conflicts daily. It would be like living with
someone
whom you have constant personality clashes with. It just wouldn’t
work. That's
how it was for me. I found that I had no peace at all trying to do
this, so I
had to eventually give up trying, so that I could just be a normal
human being
again!
So, as usual, the
extreme
fanatical set-in-stone beliefs of Christians just doesn’t add up,
is not
realistic, not logical and goes against common sense as well. How long
does one
have to delude themselves before realizing the obvious?
Freethinker Darryl
Sloan,
author of Reality Check, has a great video analyzing the
“Christianity is a
relationship with God” argument:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUfUVjhbcJY
Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page