Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page
Debunking Christian Circular Arguments and Assumptions
Argument # 7:
The
Resurrection of Jesus Christ Argument.
Jesus’
Resurrection is one of
the most feel-good statements of faith that Christians use to try to
separate
their religion from the rest. This is especially true on
Easter Sunday,
which commemorates the Resurrection. The argument goes like
this:
“Jesus
was crucified and killed on Friday. But he rose from the dead
Sunday
morning and appeared to his disciples. This proved that he
was who he
claimed to be – the Savior of the world, God in flesh, and
that his claim that
your eternal destiny depends on him to be true. No other
religious leader
or messiah has done this. Mohammed, Buddha and Confucius are
still in the
grave, but Jesus’ tomb is empty. That’s
what sets him apart from the
rest. This proves that Jesus is the real messiah and that he
is the only
true way to God. Only God could have performed such a
feat.”
To try to back this
up, the
Christians have a set of circular arguments to try to prove that the
Resurrection of Jesus is a historical fact and it is the only
conclusion one
can draw from the events in the Gospels. We will get into
that in the
next few sections after this one.
But first,
let’s
look at the
straight facts here. There are more problems, discrepancies,
and lack of
evidence regarding this alleged event, than the devout Christians can
imagine!
First of all, what
the
church
doesn't tell you is that outside of the New Testament, there are NO
historical
documents from the era that say that Jesus rose from the dead. Not even
one. Even
the most knowledgeable Christian apologist or scholar will reluctantly
admit
this. In addition, even more damaging is the fact that
outside of the New
Testament, none of the historians of the time during the period Jesus
supposedly
lived (approximately 0 AD - 33 AD) even mention the existence of a
Jesus of
Nazareth. It’s not in any of their writings,
accounts, or reports. That is
a tremendous blow to the Christian religion. Christian apologists
though, try
to cite historians of a later era such as Josephus or
Tacitus. However,
those historians lived long after Jesus’ time and were
reporting on rumors and
stories they heard. Also, some scholars think that the
writings of
Josephus referring to Jesus are an interpolation for many reasons,
which you
can read about here Did
Jesus Christ Really Live?
Second, believers
will tell
you that the apostle Paul claimed in 1 Corinthians 15:16 that there
were five
hundred people who witnessed the resurrection of Jesus.
However, there is
a difference between one person claiming that there were five hundred
witnesses
and five hundred witnesses themselves claiming that they saw the
resurrection. Not one of these five hundred witnesses has
ever been
identified in any way.
Third, it’s
very
suspicious
that after Jesus rose from the dead, he only appeared to his followers,
and not
to any of the non-believers, Romans, the Jewish leaders, or people who
had no
interest invested in his ministry. Now think about this for a
moment. If the resurrection actually happened, and five
hundred people
saw it, it would have drawn such monumental attention that Pilate and
the other
Roman officials would have noted it, along with the Roman historians at
the
time! And almost everyone around would have been
converted!
However, we DON'T even have ONE historical document other than the New
Testament, which itself was completed almost a century after Christ's
existence, that validates the Resurrection!
Fourth, the
Resurrection
event that was described in the four Gospels - Matthew, Mark, Luke and
John,
were not even written until decades after Jesus’ supposed
crucifixion.
Scholars and historians have different estimates of when the Gospels
were
written (with Christian scholars estimating the dates much closer to
Jesus’
lifetime of course) but the earliest texts of those Gospels are
nevertheless
dated long after Jesus’ supposed life on Earth. In
fact, those four
Gospels weren't even mentioned by the Church Fathers until the Second
Century
A.D.!
For more in-depth
analysis
of
the Resurrection claim, see The
Historicity of Jesus’ Resurrection: The Debate between
Christians and Skeptics
by Jeffery Jay Lowder and Why
I Don’t Buy the Resurrection Story
by Richard Carrier.
To hear from both
sides of
this issue, see these transcripts of debates between well versed
apologists and
skeptics on the historicity of the Resurrection.
The
Barker-Horner Debate: Did Jesus Really Rise From the Dead?
(1996)
The Geisler-Till Debate
(1994)
Horner-Till
Debate
(1995)
Arguments for
the Historicity of the Resurrection
Now, Christian
apologists
and
evangelists have a series of circular arguments to try to prove that
the
Resurrection of Jesus happened and is a historical fact.
Christian author
Josh McDowell for instance, is well known among Christians for these kind
of arguments he elaborates on in his books such as
“Evidence That Demands A Verdict” and
“More Than A Carpenter”. Other
authors such as C.S. Lewis (author of the Chronicles of Narnia series)
and many
others use the same line of arguments in their books and
literature.
Let’s look at some of them.
The empty tomb
argument
This Christian
argument
states
that since Jesus’ tomb was empty on Sunday morning as
described in the Gospels,
we must therefore consider all the explanations for it being
empty. The
possible explanations are 1) Jesus
didn’t die on
the cross. Having survived, he escaped from the tomb, 2)
Thieves stole
Jesus’ body, 3) Jesus’ disciplines came and stole
his body, 4) Jesus rose from
the dead, moved the stone, made the guard go to sleep, etc. as the
Gospels
describe.
Christians argue
that the 1st
explanation is ruled out because a) medically speaking, the wounds
Jesus was
inflicted with were too brutal for anyone with a human body to have
survived,
b) Jesus was pierced in the side by a spear from a Roman guard, which
would
have caused too much damage and loss of blood for him to have survived,
c) Even
if Jesus was still alive after the crucifixion, he would have been too
weak to
have moved the huge stone that covered the entrance to his tomb,
nevertheless
get past the Roman guard on post to protect the tomb from robbers.
The consider the 2nd
and 3rd
explanations to also be ruled out, because a) the Roman
guard stationed at the tomb to protect it from robbers would not have
fallen
asleep because in those days, they would be executed for such a
failure, and b)
it would take too much force to move the large stone covering the tomb
entrance
anyway.
Therefore, they
conclude
that
the 4th
explanation is the only possible one, that Jesus rose from
the dead, used his divine powers to roll back the stone and cause the
guard to
go to sleep, and appeared to his disciples. How convenient.
The problem with
all this,
again, is that it assumes that the events described in the Gospels are
historical facts. Any unbiased historian will tell you that
the Gospels
were written with an agenda to
preach the good news to people in order
to convert the masses. Therefore, we have zero evidence that
any of the
events surround the Resurrection even took place as
described.
In fact, I could
use the
same
arguments above in a similar manner to attempt to prove certain things
about
Superman as well.
Christian
Argument # 1:
Jesus
was born of a virgin. Therefore he must have been divine,
because no
ordinary human could have been born of a virgin.
Likewise
Superman
Argument # 1:
As a
baby, Superman was sent to Earth in a meteor shaped rocket
ship. Nothing
of this world could have designed a ship like that that could travel
for so
many light years. Therefore, he must have truly been of
extraterrestrial
origin!
Christian
Argument # 2:
During
Jesus' ministry, he performed supernatural miracles such as feeding the
three
thousand, healing the sick, and walking over water. These
miracles can
only be done by someone divine.
Likewise
Superman
Argument # 2:
During
Superman's life, he can go faster than a speeding bullet, is more
powerful than
a locomotive, and leap over tall buildings in a single bound.
These
superhuman feats can only be done by someone from out of this world!
Christian
Argument # 3:
The people
around Jesus were witnesses to all the miracles and supernatural feats
he
did. There were also witnesses to his resurrection as well.
Likewise
Superman
Argument # 3:
When
Superman saves lives in Metropolis and around the world, there are
usually
plenty of witnesses and reporters who witness and capture on film his
amazing
rescues with his amazing powers.
For an in-depth analysis of the empty tomb argument, see Craig's Empty Tomb and Habermas on Visions by Richard Carrier.
The
“Apostles would not knowingly die for a lie”
argument
Then they go on to
say that
since the Apostles and disciples of Christ were so fervent in their
faith and
ministry that they were even willing to die for it, and many of them
eventually
did, that they must have personally witnessed the Resurrection
themselves to be
preaching it in their ministry to the world that Jesus died for our
sins and
rose from the grave. After all, they claim, no one would knowingly
die for something they know to be a lie. And the fact that
they were
willing to die and become martyrs for the Gospel of Christ proves that
the
Resurrection must have happened.
Again, this assumes
that
everything described in the New Testament are true accounts.
We simply
have no basis for assuming that, especially when the books of the NT
were
written long after Jesus and his disciples supposedly lived.
And neither
do we have any evidence either, that the disciples died for their faith
and
became martyrs. There simply is no confirmation of
that. I could
take any fictional story to draw conclusions in the same manner as
these
apologists do.
For more analyses on this issue, see Why Did the Apostles Die? and How Did the Apostles Die? For some short rants purporting that the Apostles were made up, see http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/apostles.html
Furthermore, the
popular
legend among Christians that the first century Christians were
persecuted by
the
However, for some
reason,
the
Christians at the time wanted martyrdom, and went to great lengths to
get
it. They even went so far as to insult the other pagan gods
and religions
of the time by calling them demons and devils, and their followers
“devil
worshippers”. They (the Christians) were the ones
who were intolerant of
other beliefs, and actively offended many. In fact, they are
recorded as
being eager to be sentenced by the law, although the Romans tried to
use any
legal means to avoid it. Paul Tobin of The
Skeptic’s Guide to
Christianity,
writes:
http://www.rejectionofpascalswager.net/xtianpersecute.html
“In
fact, more often than not, the Roman judges used every legal means at
their
disposal to avoid punishing the Christians. But the Christians, in the
morbid
need for the reward of martyrdom, more often than not insisted on being
sentenced. As an example, take the incident in
If
you return to your sense you can obtain pardon of our Lord the emperor
... We
too are a religious people, and our religion is a simple one: We swear
by the
divine spirit of our lord the emperor and offer prayers to his health -
as you
ought to do.
The
accused men were indignant and refused to do so. Saturninus, in a last
ditch
effort, gave them thirty days to think things over. After that time,
they still
refused to budge. The proconsul had no choice but to have them
executed. Upon
receiving the death sentence some of them yelled out: "We thank
God!", "Today we are martyrs in heaven, thanks
be to God!" [11]
Not
only do these Christians zealously demanded execution upon trail, some
of them,
hard put to find someone to accuse them, went to the tribunal of
magistrates,
declared themselves Christians and demanded the sentence of the law. We
have
testimony of earlier the church father Tertullian (c160-c225) of one
such case
in a small Asiatic town. The whole Christian population of that town,
seeking
death and martyrdom, went to the proconsul Antoninus to demand
punishment.
Unable to comprehend such an attitude, Antoninus told the Christians:
"Unhappy men! Unhappy men! If you are thus weary of your lives, is it
so
difficult for you to find ropes and precipices?" Of course, suicide
doesn't count for martyrdom, so the crowd insisted on punishment.
Antoninus
relented, put a few to death and dismissed the others. [12]
Capital
punishment was not invariably applied in all cases. Some Roman judges
used
other legal methods to avoid it. They contented themselves to
sentencing the
Christians to prison, exile or slavery. This allowed the Christians
some chance
of freedom as the emperor might, during a period of celebration, offer
a
general pardon to the prisoners. [13]
11.ibid: p97-98
12.Knight,
Honest to Man: p61
Gibbon, Decline And Fall of the
Robertson, History of Christianity: p81
13.Gibbon,
Decline And Fall of the
Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page