your past experiences are BORING
i dont care about that i care about seeing it
but you wouldnt do it since you already know you cant do it


Daz - Remote Viewing TestRe: Daz - Remote Viewing Testyou omited the part where i said that
your past experiences are BORING i dont care about that i care about seeing it but you wouldnt do it since you already know you cant do it ![]() ![]() For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Daz - Remote Viewing Testyes daz
please point out another one of your amazing hits just like the one that you forgot you mentioned MUSIC when talking about a TORNADO and then you deny it !! Nostradamus kicked your butt on that one cherry picking at it best!!! go ahead and do it for us common ![]() For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Daz - Remote Viewing Testyou have many more what?
examples of cherry picking? Who cares? Do it or back off with those links is just nonsense at it best For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Daz - Remote Viewing Testbottom line
daz wont do a test for us because he cant do it he knows we wont accept his retrofitting he rather post links than to prove him right poor daz so self delluded For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Daz - Remote Viewing TestI truly think that Daz believes he can do what he says, but unfortunately, his experiments just don't stand up as far as I can tell. Reading his viewings, there are so many different words and phrases thrown about that the chance that some will fit with a target is bound to happen. If there are five people doing a remote viewing test on the Sydney Opera house and one of them got it spot on by actually naming it as the Sydney Opera House rather than what could be one of many, many seaside buildings, that would be impressive but not necessarily paranormal. If all five people viewed the same thing, that would be even more impressive, but in his view of the Sydney Opera House, what did the other four people draw? Did they come up with the same thoughts? Those viewings aren't shared in his post. Also, I don't know how many people are actually doing the viewing so those numbers are figurative.
I wish that the next time he does a blind viewing, he shares his notes with us and lets us determine what it is he's attempting to view in advance of the target reveal. Then, once the real target is revealed, let's see how many of us interpreted the target correctly. Would you be willing to do that for us Daz?
Re: Daz - Remote Viewing TestFor every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Daz - Remote Viewing TestThe logic used by Daz and many others on that side of the fence is well illustrated by this cartoon.
![]()
Re: Daz - Remote Viewing TestFor every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Return to Psychic Phenomena / ESP / Telepathy Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
|