telekinesis, pyrokinesis, ouija board, psychic readings are a few of the videos that are debunked from youtube (which they previously posted)
it is conducted by the Derren Brown
awesome site, with a lot of things to think about
science of scams
29 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
science of scamstelekinesis, pyrokinesis, ouija board, psychic readings are a few of the videos that are debunked from youtube (which they previously posted)
it is conducted by the Derren Brown awesome site, with a lot of things to think about For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: science of scamsFor every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: science of scamsLooks like a cool link CISCOP.
I'll go through it in detail in a day or so. I did the Are You A Believer test and came out as follows: You have scored 30 points! You are a: MILD SCEPTIC You find it hard to believe in the paranormal and you have doubts behind the reliability of many sources. You think that most stories are scams and you don't like to waste your time thinking about them. You are not superstitious and you like to believe that there is a scientific answer behind most things.
Re: science of scamsTake it for what it's worth....here's me:
You have scored 28 points! You are a: MILD SCEPTIC You find it hard to believe in the paranormal and you have doubts behind the reliability of many sources. You think that most stories are scams and you don't like to waste your time thinking about them. You are not superstitious and you like to believe that there is a scientific answer behind most things.
Re: science of scamsthis is me
You have scored 36 points! You are a: STRONG SCEPTIC You do not believe in anything that doesn't have scientific facts behind it. You believe that you have to experience something yourself in order to have faith in it, and as you haven't experienced any paranormal events you are a strict non-believer. You think that luck or fluke are at the heart of most 'supernatural events' and you believe the rest are complete fakes. which kind of funny last night i was at a xmas party and suddenly people start telling their ghost stories i do enjoy hearing this stories For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: science of scamsThese guys have already been debunked. Check out their videos .. caught manipulating. One of them is a hypno-magician and the other is a pharm shill for realz.
Re: science of scamsFor every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: science of scamsThat's right .. he's a magician. He's not a scientist. The videos are not science but entertainment. The videos are funny little fabricated stories to make people (idiots) believe they are seeing science. But it's not science. It's magic. It's skeptic magic.
Re: science of scamsFor every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: science of scams![]() ![]() I do believe most people that had even preliminary Psychology classes in school is familiar with ideomotor syndrome, I even teach people with mobility issues how to use this technique in steering their wheelchairs (the joysticks really are that sensitive). BUT, there is another reality here that I bring up only because of my personal work with dowsing. Simply put, there IS a lot more to it than what the analytical want to use as a cover-all explanation; not in the case of Derren or any other Psychic Entertainer type character (including yours truly) but when working with someone that really is "in tune" with things, pendulums, planchettes, rods and yokes can go a bit crazy... I've had water twigs pull me hard enough to fall and seen them literally pulled from a persons hands and stuck into the ground. Please understand what I'm saying here; I'm not saying that ideomotor isn't involved. In the majority of cases it is very much what's afoot but in certain rare settings very dramatic things can happen when working with such systems. BTW... I do make nice wood planchettes if anyone wants to go ghost hunting ![]()
Re: science of scamsTwags that make you fell?
was that an iron twag and you were looking for a 30pounds neodiminium magnet? For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: science of scamsnever heard about that story...
i know channing pollock was known for being one of the greatest in dove magic a lot of the stuff he created is still in use by dove workers today. but i never knew he was on that side of the fence all right.. so.. the water has to be moving so the test done by Randi with dowsers was badly made because the water was just hidden between 50 other closed containers and it was sitted not moving like you said so they were bound to fail.. that´s interesting it´s a shame that the dowsers didnt said that and took the test. here is a little of the great Channing Pollock For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: science of scamsThere's a joke in the Psychic World known as the RANDI RETIREMENT PROGRAM. Essentially, you get in on his challenge or whatever so he gets you on the radio, Tv, etc. and after he's run of gloating about proving you a nut case, you go out and book a lecture circuit at top dollar through the speaker's associations across the country. Tour for a couple of years, write the book and in under a decade, retire with a nice 7 digit nest egg.
If that old perv only knew how much the psychics were taking him for a ride ![]()
Re: science of scamsFor every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
29 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Return to JREF / Randi Challenge Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests |
|