but
well done
you are the pack leader of the anti skepticism movement
i clearly can see you as the antitesis of randi
my vote is on you

i really believe this is the best attempt ever to discredit jref
and you will be the closest one to get to do it
Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREF
42 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREFi dont know what are you talking about as usual
but well done you are the pack leader of the anti skepticism movement i clearly can see you as the antitesis of randi my vote is on you ![]() i really believe this is the best attempt ever to discredit jref and you will be the closest one to get to do it For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREFRandi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREFhahaha you want me to cross the world to see you?
no thanks, thats sounds like a dangerous adventure i dont want to be in western australia evening news ¨mental patient kills tourist¨ but i do promess i will go to your country looks like a beautiful place full of awesome people and the best looking girls on the planet (to me at least) have a good one! and I FIRMLY BELIEVE that you are one of the best guys around that the antiskepticism movement has to offer you should be their leader you are AWESOME, i bow to your greatness For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREFI was in a park today and a leaf moved,was that you highflyertoo? LMAO.
I'm always very skeptical of any situation where someone's notability hinges on their connection to another notable person
Re: Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREFRandi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREFHighflyer,
I believe you can lift a car because I have lifted one myself before. Gotta love modern conveniences such as car jacks.
Re: Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREFMy time of Telekinesis will happen from when I turn 42 years old which coincides with the Death of President Barack Obama .
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREFi thought you already proved your telekinesis powers
man... you know highflyer when i think about you i think about that J.Lo movie: ¨the cell¨ i would really like to see what´s up in your mind you and radin gotta be the craziest people around all the power to you For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREFRandi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREFgot to agree with you there prof - our politico's are shining example of moral rectitude ( or is that immoral rectums ?? )
![]() ![]() as to fake mediums the following may be of intrest : Until recently, in extreme cases, con artists posing as psychics or mediums could be prosecuted under the Fraudulent Mediums Act 1951. Prosecutions were rare, though, because successful conviction demanded that an “intent to deceive” be demonstrated. In 2008, the Fraudulent Mediums Act was abolished, and the problem of fake psychics is dealt with now as a fair trading issue rather than a criminal matter. Even in the realm of the paranormal, you still have consumer rights. ** If you believe a “psychic” is operating fraudulently, and money is involved, you can report them to the Trading Standards organisation. They may be able to take action. If the psychic advertises, and you believe the claims in the advertisement are false or misleading, you can also report them to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA). One unfortunate “psychic” called Zara found herself hauled in front of the ASA which rejected her claims that she was the “UK’s premier psychic”, that her spells could lead to success in “ Love Money Health Career & Family” and that “for every problem there is a solution”. She was ordered not to make such claims again. Thanks to an EU directive, all psychics operating in Britain are required to post a disclaimer on their business premises, stating that the service is supplied for entertainment purposes only. see we got em taped over here - yea right ![]() ** - however when approaching your local trading standards department - be prepared NOT to be taken too seriously ![]()
Re: Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREFPeople who are hell bent on taking advantage of others will always find that legal loophole to wiggle their way out of trouble. Since there are no regulations on anything associated with the paranormal subjects, it's like declaring open season. In order to take something like this to court, you need to rely on basic business practice laws or State/local license law.
Organized religions around the world used this for centuries.
Re: Prophetic Telekinesis to debunk JREFThanks for sharing that info Brett. Good stuff!
My personal thought is that the "for entertainment purposes" clause is to protect the psychic rather than the victim, er, uh, uhm, the person receiving the reading. I don't think that disclaimer does much to detract the person wanting to spend money, but it does offer a "way out" for those psychics who are acting fraudulently. Again, just my biased opinion.
42 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Return to JREF / Randi Challenge Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests |
|