Discuss General Topics.
by Eteponge » 29 Jun 2010, 04:55
Interestingly enough, there was a wave of triangle UFO sightings in North Carolina in the late 1980s to early 1990s. (Which is where mine took place in 1991.) And guess what I found, another Triangle UFO case in NC where the UFO looked *exactly* (100%) like the one I personally saw and described ... http://www.examiner.com/x-2363-UFO-Exam ... iangle-UFO
"I think Eteponge's Blog is a pretty cool guy. eh debates Skeptics and doesnt afraid of anything."
-
Eteponge
-
- Posts: 300
- Joined: 06 Jun 2009, 13:26
-
by ProfWag » 29 Jun 2010, 08:13
-
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by really? » 29 Jun 2010, 10:43
My first sighting of an UFO took place way back in 8/69. Saw three that night in about five minutes.
-
really?
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: 06 Mar 2010, 20:58
by caniswalensis » 29 Jun 2010, 19:50
Uh, guys..... Why are we talking UFOs in this thread?
-
caniswalensis
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: 02 Jun 2010, 03:41
by NinjaPuppy » 29 Jun 2010, 20:16
Good catch Canis.
Thank you for pointing that out.
-
NinjaPuppy
-
- Posts: 4002
- Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 20:44
by ProfWag » 29 Jun 2010, 20:29
-
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by really? » 30 Jun 2010, 07:41
-
really?
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: 06 Mar 2010, 20:58
by ProfWag » 30 Jun 2010, 09:40
-
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by Indigo Child » 30 Jun 2010, 10:45
This is where good ole's occams razor comes in. The simplest explanation that fits the data is good.
The simplest explanation is it is a craft that does not belong to us and defies all our laws of physics, it therefore is not a human craft.
Simple.
All other explanations require multiplication of variables. If it a secret governmental craft, then why spend billions on obsolete techology like rocketry and still use obsolete science. The reports of these UFO's go back several decades, when we had propeller-driven planes. If they really belonged to us, why did we keep them secret all this time, and why not use them in wars?
The explanation does not fly(pun intended)
-
Indigo Child
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 22 May 2009, 08:01
by ProfWag » 30 Jun 2010, 20:47
-
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by Indigo Child » 01 Jul 2010, 00:49
The simplest explanation, that fits the data
Come on face it, you cannot deny the ETH given the data, so you deny the data.
All of the secret US planes you mentioned are consistent with our human physics and they do not match the descriptions given of UFO's and their flight.
You really need to break this habit of forcing explanations that do not fit.
-
Indigo Child
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 22 May 2009, 08:01
by ProfWag » 01 Jul 2010, 01:38
Believing in UFOs doesn't do much harm to society so if you'd like to believe that without using critical thinking skills, then by all means, believe away.
-
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by Indigo Child » 01 Jul 2010, 04:13
The point here is, it is you are who are not using critical thinking by forcing explanations that do not fit. On the contrary, all of us who are are arriving at the conclusions that UFO's exist, are doing so by looking at the data and accepting the simplest explanation that fits the data.
Like I said, face it, you cannot deny the ETH given the data, so you deny the data.
You're the believer here, not us.
-
Indigo Child
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 22 May 2009, 08:01
by ProfWag » 01 Jul 2010, 04:50
-
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
Return to General Discussions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests
|
|