Skeptic agrees that Remote Viewing is Proven
40 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: Skeptic agrees that Remote Viewing is ProvenMike G.
Quantum Paranormal
Re: Skeptic agrees that Remote Viewing is ProvenI believe I've found the source of this "34%" reference: Utts, Jessica, AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EVIDENCE FOR PSYCHIC FUNCTIONING, 1995. It's a meta-analysis, so I'll have to search the underlying experiments' protocols in order to ascertain whether or not they employed multiple raters.
Mike G.
Quantum Paranormal
Re: Skeptic agrees that Remote Viewing is ProvenMike G.
Quantum Paranormal
Re: Skeptic agrees that Remote Viewing is ProvenSo we begin with an out of context statement about one or more studies and we end up with circling the wagons.
The 3 lines of defense are simply unimportant. The issue is being able to defend a position. Those who have not been to a scientific meeting have no idea what it means to defend a claim. Are you pretending that the tough questions are reserved for the psi believers? Then you would be mistaken. Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Skeptic agrees that Remote Viewing is ProvenScimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Skeptic agrees that Remote Viewing is ProvenMike G.
Quantum Paranormal
Re: Skeptic agrees that Remote Viewing is ProvenFor every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Skeptic agrees that Remote Viewing is ProvenMike G.
Quantum Paranormal
40 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests |
|