Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page
Debunking PseudoSkeptical Arguments of Paranormal Debunkers
Argument # 7: Automatic
dismissal of paranormal claims as due to mistake, lying or
hallucination
Stated as:
“Since
paranormal
phenomena is impossible, those who claim to have them must be mistaken,
lying, or hallucinating.”
PseudoSkeptics
who
can’t
explain away a paranormal event usually classify witnesses as either
mistaken,
lying, or hallucinating.
This again
reflect an emotional and fanatical belief on their part that any
paranormal
event is impossible.
They don’t really
know that a claimant must
fit one of
the above categories, they convince themselves of it to keep their
mental model
paradigms intact.
This is further
evidenced by the fact that many skeptics will continue to insist on one
of
these three categories even when such explanations do not fit the data
or are
far too unlikely.
It’s another
example
of where they prefer a false explanation over a paranormal one.
A
common fallacy these skeptics make is to assert that those who claim to
have
paranormal experiences do not consider other mundane explanations for
their
experience, and instead jump to paranormal conclusions.
Well
that simply isn't true at all.
In almost every story you
read or hear about
of a paranormal experience, the claimant almost always describes the
possible
mundane explanations that he/she considered, and how they were ruled
out before
coming to their unconventional conclusion.
It's there in simple plain
language, yet somehow skeptics never seem to
see this.
What skeptics don't
understand
is, if the possible mundane explanations don't fit the facts or are too
improbable to be believed, then they can and should be ruled out.
Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page