Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page
Debunking PseudoSkeptical Arguments of Paranormal Debunkers
Argument
# 22:
The Skeptical
explanation for precognitive dreams - Selective memory and coincidence.
Stated as:
“The explanation
for precognitive dreams is that you
selectively remember the dreams that come true but not those that
don't, and attribute it to precognition.”
This is a
standard cop out
that basically says “If we can’t explain something
or it doesn’t fit into our
paradigm of reality” then it must be due to coincidence. To
declare that with
an absolute certainty requires that the skeptic have absolute
infallible
omniscient knowledge of the universe. They certainly don’t
have that. Therefore
they are not qualified to declare what is a coincidence and what
isn’t.
Logically they should just say “I don’t
know”, but as we’ve seen time and time
again, they are prejudiced against admitting that they don’t
know something,
due to their fear and psychological block against the mysterious. They
hate
mysteries and can’t tolerate their existence, so they need to
explain every
mystery away. That’s their philosophy, but it’s not
logical (unless you’re
going by their hijacked definition of logic which supports their warped
philosophy). Again, they are making unqualified declarations due to
their
prejudices and biases, not objectivity.
Here is an
example of a
compelling precognitive dream cited by Larry Dossey M.D., author of The
Power of Premonitions:
“Amanda,
a young mother in
Washington State, was awakened one night by a horrible dream. She
dreamed that
the chandelier in the next room had fallen from the ceiling onto her
sleeping
infant’s crib and crushed the baby. In the dream she saw a
clock in the baby’s
room that read 4:35, and that wind and rain were hammering the windows.
Extremely upset, she awakened her husband and told him her dream. He
said it
was silly and to go back to sleep. But the dream was so frightening
that Amanda
went into the baby’s room and brought it back to bed with
her. Soon she was
awakened by a loud crash in the baby’s room. She rushed in to
see that the
chandelier had fallen and crushed the crib -- and that the clock in the
room
read 4:35, and that wind and rain were howling outside. Her dream
premonition
was camera-like in detail, including the specific event, the precise
time, and
even a change in the weather.”
As you can
see, this is a
compelling case highly suggestive of our occasional ability to glimpse
forward
into time and space. But since it doesn’t fit the
pseudoskeptic's paradigm, it
MUST, by their definition, be due to coincidence. It still constitutes
zero
evidence to them. This is not only faulty logic, but it’s
indicative of an
agenda to suppress our expansion of consciousness.
Besides,
we don’t
know that
much about where dreams come from and what they mean to assume that
they’re
nothing but random thoughts and images.
We understand how people
dream, but not why.
Skeptics again are
inadvertently claiming to
know too much to declare something false or coincidental.
In
addition, the fact that there is
convincing evidence for psychic phenomena in general such as telepathy
from the
numerous labs that did the Ganzfeld experiments, psychokinesis from
Princeton’s
20 year PEAR programs, and remote viewing/clairvoyance
from SRI and
other
research labs, makes precognition much more probable than otherwise. You
see, when one form of psi is proven, it
raises the plausibility of the others by indicating that there are
indeed paranormal
powers of consciousness that we don’t understand.
Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page