Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page
Debunking PseudoSkeptical Arguments of Paranormal Debunkers
Argument # 19: Alternative
medicine and remedies have no
scientific basis. All claims of their effectiveness are due
to placebo effect
or coincidence.
This is a
very presumptuous
statement and a rush to judgment. It
basically presumes that if we don’t understand how or why
something works, then
it must be due to chance, the placebo effect or the person’s
own
imagination.
Since we don't know
everything there is to know about the body and mind, why should we
assume that
only what we understand is real and the rest is superstition? There
are already many functions, mechanisms
and processes of the body and mind that we don't fully understand. Some
examples of these are photographic
memory, the ability of people with autism to perform lightning mental
calculations, extraordinary and gifted musical aptitude in child
prodigies,
certain mental disorders, dreaming, aging, consciousness itself, etc. Now
if everything we didn’t understand was
due to superstition, then nothing would have really worked until we
understood
how it worked, which is ludicrous and almost anything in nature can
prove that
wrong.
Likewise, we still
don’t
understand why women who live together tend to menstruate in the same
cycles
either, but that doesn’t mean that it’s not true. Just
because we don’t understand why
something works, doesn’t mean that it doesn’t work. Reality
does not conform to what we are able
to understand.
There are not two strict
categories where either 1) we understand it, or 2) it’s just
a placebo effect.
The
important thing is that
if an alternative treatment works, then we should try to understand how
and why
it works, rather than trying to put it on the same significance
level as placebos.
Understanding the
mechanism behind the placebo effect is important, as it teaches us more
about
the mind/body connection.
Marcello Truzzi,
one of the founders of CSICOP
(who broke away from it later due to
its rising fanaticism), has emphasized this to me before.
Michael
Talbot also pointed out in The
Holographic Universe: (page
91)
“We now know
that on average 35 percent of all people
who receive a given placebo will experience a significant effect,
although this
number can vary greatly from situation to situation.
In
addition to angina pectoris, conditions
that have proved responsive to placebo treatment include migraine
headaches, allergies,
fever, the common cold, acne, asthma, warts, various kinds of pain,
nausea and
seasickness, peptic ulcers, psychiatric syndromes such as depression
and
anxiety, rheumatoid and degenerative arthritis, diabetes, radiation
sickness,
Parkinsonism, multiple sclerosis, and cancer.”
Besides,
many alternative
medicine practices are based on the power of thought and visualization. For
those, a case can be made for the
validity of the mind over matter theory since labs like
Princeton’s PEAR research
labs have pretty much proven that micro-psychokinesis
exist.
Even before this, an
abundance of
medical research already proved that a mind body connection exists far
deeper
than we had thought.
In fact, studies
have been done to prove the power of mental visualization techniques
over the
body.
For example, Dr. O. Carl
Simonton,
a radiation oncologist and medical director of the Cancer Counseling
and
“In a follow-up
study, Simonton and his colleagues
taught their mental imagery techniques to 159 patients with cancers
considered
medically incurable.
The expected
survival time for such a patient is twelve months.
Four
years later 63 of the patients were
still alive.
Of those, 14 showed no
evidence of disease, the cancers were regressing in 12, and in 17 the
disease
was stable.
The average survival time of
the group as a whole was 24.4 months, over twice as long as the
national norm.
(Footnote 1) ……. Simonton has since conducted a
number of similar studies, all
with positive results.
Footnote 1 from back of
book:
Stephanie
Matthews-Simonton, O. Carl Simonton, and
James L. Creighton, Getting Well Again (New York: Bantam Books, 1980),
pp.
6-12.”
Although
there are plenty of
quack things in alternative medicine today, the fact is that certain
types of
alternative healing practices have already been proven to work. Skeptics
are often misinformed on these.
One strong example is
Acupuncture.
When first introduced in the
west, it was
thought to be superstition and only due to the placebo effect. However,
as it was more and more commonly
practiced, doctors and the public came to realize that there was
something to
it after all.
In fact, the American
Medical Association now says that acupuncture is an effective form of
treatment.
There are also plenty of
studies to support this.
Michael Talbot
describes some of them in The
Holographic Universe: (page
113-116)
“Although still
controversial, acupuncture is gaining
acceptance in the medical community and has even been used successfully
to
treat chronic back pain in racehorses.
In 1957 a French
physician and acupuncturist named
Paul Nogier
published a book called Treatise
of Auriculotherapy,
in which he announced his discovery that in addition to the major
acupuncture
system, there are two smaller acupuncture systems on both ears. He
dubbed these acupuncture microsystems
and noted that when one played a kind of
connect-the-dots game with them, they formed an anatomical map of a
miniature
human inverted like a fetus (see fig. 13).
Unbeknownst to Nogier,
the Chinese had
discovered the "little man in the ear" nearly 4,000 years earlier,
but a map of the Chinese ear system wasn't published until after Nogier
had already laid claim to the idea.
The little man in the ear
is not a just a charming
aside in the history of acupuncture. Dr.
Terry Oleson,
a psychobiologist
at the Pain Management Clinic at the
(In the book, a diagram
of a fetus shape in the ear
is here)
(Figure 13 The Little Man
in the Ear.
Acupuncturists have found
that the
acupuncture points in the ear form the outline of a miniature human
being.
Dr. Terry Oleson,
a
psychobiologist
at UCLA's
Ear examinations can also
reveal problems with the
bones and internal organs.
Once when Oleson
was out boating with an acquaintance he noticed an
abnormally flaky patch of skin in one of the man's ears.
From
his research Oleson
knew the spot corresponded to the heart, and he suggested to the man
that he
might want to get his heart checked. The
man went to his doctor the next day and discovered he had a cardiac
problem
which required immediate open-heart surgery. (Footnote 73)
Oleson also uses electrical
stimulation of the acupuncture
points in the ear to treat chronic pain, weight problems, hearing loss,
and
virtually all kinds of addiction. In
one
study of 14 narcotic addicted indiviuals,
Oleson
and his colleagues used ear acupuncture to eliminate
the drug requirements of 12 of them in an average of 5 days and with
only
minimal withdrawal symptoms. (Footnote 74)
Indeed, ear acupuncture has
proved so successful in bringing about rapid
narcotic detoxification that clinics in both
Why would the acupuncture
points in the ear be
aligned in the shape of a miniature human?
Oleson
believes it is because of the
holographic nature of the mind and body. Just
as every portion of a hologram contains
the image of the whole, every portion of the body may also contain the
image of
the whole.
"The ear holograph is,
logically, connected to the brain holograph which itself is conected
to the whole body," he states.
"The way we use the ear to
affect the rest of the body is by
working through the brain holograph." (Footnote 75)
Oleson believes there are
probably acupuncture microsystems
in other parts of the body as well. Dr.
Ralph Alan Dale, the director of the
Richard Leviton,
a
contributing editor at East West magazine, who has written about the
holographic implications of acupuncture microsystems,
thinks that alternative medical techniques - such as reflexology, a
type of
massage therapy that involves accessing all points of the body through
stimulation
of the feet, and iridology, a diagnostic technique that involves
examining the
iris of the eye in order to determine the condition fo
the body - may also be indications of the body's holographic nature. Leviton
concedes
that neither field has been experimentally vindicated (studies of
iridology, in
particular, have produced extremely conflicting results) but feels the
holographic idea offers a way of understanding them if their legitimacy
is
established.
Corresponding footnotes
from back of the book:
72. Terrence
D. Oleson,
Richeard
J. Kroening,
and David E. Bresler,
"An Experimental Evaluation of Auricular Diagnosis: The Somatotopic
Mapping of Musculoskeletal Pain at Ear
Acupuncture Points," Pain 8 (1980), pp. 217-29.
73. Private
communication with author, September 24, 1988.
74. Terrence
D. Oleson
and Richard J. Kroening,
"Rapid Narcotic Detoxification in Chronic Pain Patients Treated with
Auricular Electroacupuncture
and Naloxone,"
International Journal of the Addictions 20, no. 9 (1985), pp. 1347-60.
75. Richard
Leviton,
"The Holographic Body," East West 18,
no. 8 (August 1988), p. 42.
76. Ibid.,
p.
45.”
An
experiment described in Discover
magazine
(September 1998 issue)
revealed that neurological evidence from MRI scans of the brain
supported
Acupuncture.
Here are some excerpts from
the magazine, which you can read online at http://www.discover.com/sept_issue/acupunc.html:
“Cho's
unexpected relief prodded his
professional curiosity. As a physicist working in radiology, Cho
develops ways
to image the complex inner workings of the body; one of his inventions
was a
prototype PET scanner around 1975. How, he wondered, could inserting
needles
into seemingly random points on the body possibly affect human health?
So he decided
to take a closer look, and what he found astounded him. While sticking
needles
into a few student volunteers, he took pictures of their brains and
discovered
that by stimulating an acupuncture point said to be associated with
vision-but
that is nowhere near anything known to be connected to the eyes-he
could indeed
trigger activity in the very part of the brain that controls vision.
There just
might be something to this acupuncture thing, he
figured……………
To test
that premise, Cho strapped
student volunteers into an fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging)
machine. While standard MRI provides static cross-sectional pictures of
structures in the body, functional MRI goes further to reveal how those
structures are working.
It measures minute
changes in the amount of oxygen carried in the blood, which is
presumably a
rough measure of glucose uptake by various tissues and thus a good
indicator of
which tissues are active; the results can be viewed as colorful fmri
brain
activation maps.
Cho first
stimulated the eyes of the
volunteers through traditional means: he flashed a light in front of
them. The
resulting images, as expected, showed a concentration of color-an
increase in
activity-in the visual cortex, the portion of the brain that is known
to be
involved in eye function. Then Cho had an acupuncturist stimulate the
acupoint
VA1.
In one person after another,
the
very same region of the brain-the visual cortex-lit up on the fMRI
image.
As odd as
it seemed, sticking a needle
into someone's foot had the very same effect as shining a light in
someone's
eyes. And this was not the generalized analgesic effect, produced by
the
primitive limbic system, that was seen in the pain studies; this was a
function-specific response occurring in the brain's cortex, the area
responsible for such sophisticated functions as speech and hearing,
memory and
intellect.
Moreover, the magnitude of
brain activity seen on acupuncture stimulation was nearly as strong as
that
elicited by the flash of light.
"It was
very exciting,"
recalls Cho. "I never thought anything would happen, but it's very
clear
that stimulating the acupuncture point triggers activity in the visual
cortex." To eliminate the possibility of a placebo effect, Cho also
stimulated
a nonacupoint, in the big toe.
There was
no response in the visual cortex.
Next, Cho
tried each form of
stimulation over time, twisting the needle for a moment or flashing the
light,
resting, then repeating. As before, the fMRI images were remarkably
similar for
acupuncture and for light stimulation. The time-course study was also
done
using the three other vision acupoints on the foot. The results were
again
consistent: except in the case of VA2, each acupoint lit up the visual
cortex
exactly as the light stimulation had done. This time, however, Cho
noticed
something else. When the activation data were graphed to show the
intensity of
the response over time, he saw that there were two distinct reactions
among the
dozen volunteers. During the acupuncture phase, some showed an increase
in
activity, while others showed a decrease. In other words, in some
people,
oxygen consumption in that brain region increased, while in others, it
decreased.
"I figured
we must have made a
mistake," says Cho. Repeating the experiment, however, he saw the same
results every time. "Finally one of the acupuncturists mentioned, 'Oh,
yes, it's yin and yang.'" Cho asked him which subjects were yin and
which
were yang, and without seeing the data, the practitioner correctly
pointed out
who had shown an increase in activity (yang) and who had had a decrease
(yin)
in 11 of 12 cases. "I don't know how to explain it," Cho says.
Like many
preliminary scientific
reports, Cho's small study raises more questions than it answers.
Still, he has
demonstrated new functional effects of acupuncture. "Classically,
acupuncture was the ultimate in experimentation; people collected data
for
thousands of years," says Joie Jones, professor of radiological
sciences
at the
Yet even
if it does go through the
brain, how does stimulating a specific point on the foot trigger
activity in
the part of the brain that controls vision? There is no explanation for
that
either, says Cho, although he suspects that the path is along the
nervous
system. If that proves to be true, it's probably not the same pathway
by which
acupuncture causes the release of endorphins, says Pomeranz. "That
endorphins are released by stimulating certain types of nerves in
fibers
anywhere in the body, that's understood. But that there is a specific
connection
between your toe and your visual system is really bizarre.
That's
really mind-boggling."
Despite
the absence of clear-cut
explanations, acupuncture's clinical results are attracting interest
from
mainstream medicine. A panel of independent experts convened last year
by the
National Institutes of Health concluded that acupuncture is indeed
effective in
treating nausea due to anesthesia and chemotherapy drugs. It is also
helpful in
treating post-surgical and other forms of pain. Moreover, the panel
noted,
despite the pervasive belief in the superior clinical effects of
Western
medicine, plenty of conventional treatments for chronic pain show the
same
success rate as acupuncture-and often with harmful side effects.
One of the
more provocative
acupuncture studies used SPECT (single photon emission computed
tomography) to
record images of the brains of patients with chronic pain. That study,
by Abass
Alavi, chief of nuclear medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
Hospital,
measured blood flow to the brain structures that are suspected of
releasing
endorphins in response to acupuncture stimulus-the thalamus,
hypothalamus, and
brain stem. Comparing baseline images of people who were in pain with
images
taken after they received acupuncture treatment, Alavi found clear
evidence of
increased blood flow in the thalamus and the brain stem. He also found
that
treated patients felt less pain.
Like Cho,
Alavi was not a believer in
acupuncture or other forms of Chinese medicine before doing this study.
"I
thought acupuncture was more or less psychological, not an objective
effect," he says. "I did this study just for fun. I figured nothing
would show up."”
To read
about studies that
concluded that acupuncture had an effect beyond placebo, see
this article in Natural News.
Some
skeptics have admitted that Acupuncture may be effective for some
things, such
as pain reducation, but they maintain that the theory of chi and
meridians on
which acupuncture is based, has no merit. Bob
Carroll of The
Skeptic's
Dictionary emphasized
this in his entry on Acupuncture. What
they don’t understand about chi though is that it not only
works and gets
results, but those using it also feel its effects too, the same way you
would
feel heat from a fire.
In fact, this was
shown on one episode of Bill Moyers’
Healing and the
Mind series. Moyers
himself
experienced this firsthand.
A chi gong
healer put his finger near Moyer’s arm and Moyer smiled and
said he definitely
felt the heat go into his arm.
(I too
have had this experience when I was in
Chi
practitioners can see
and test chi at work just like we see gravity at work.
Chi
has been used by martial artists, tai chi
practitioners, and quigong
practitioners, to heal,
move objects/people without touching them, strike hard body blows with
a light
touch, remain stationary when groups of strong burly men try to move
them,
snuff out candles from across the hallway, and other feats. While
everyone supposedly has chi, learning
to control it takes years, though some seem to be able to summon it
naturally.
All a skeptic has to do to
learn about chi is to visit a martial arts dojo where chi is taught and
used.
If they ask, a demonstration
of
chi can be made either on them or one of the students.
I
have done this myself and seen
demonstrations such as masters sparring striking blows onto students
(apparent
by the painful grimace on the students’ faces) without barely
even touching
them, if at all.
I have also seen chi
practitioners in
In any
case, the bottom line
about alternative medicine/treatment is that it CAN work and it HAS
worked
before.
Now I am not one of those
anti-pharmaceutical company people who believes in forgoing all
pharmaceutical
drugs in place of herbal remedies or alternative treatments. One
of the concerns of skeptics is that people
may risk their lives by forgoing conventional drug treatments for
alternative
remedies instead.
This, they maintain,
is the danger of alternative medicine. (Michael Shermer
loves to tout that as his motivation for debunking)
However,
I do not advocate that.
I think that they should be
used in
conjunction.
If one wants to try an
alternative remedy that seems to work, he/she should in addition to
prescribed
medication given by a licensed doctor.
What
skeptics
don’t seem to
get though, is that the common sense rule is that if something WORKS,
then
people will and have a right to use it again, until it stops working. It’s
simple sound reasoning to do what simply
works, and all creatures since the beginning of our planet have done
that!
So I find it odd that many
skeptics are
advising people to stop all alternative remedies even if they work,
cure
people, or save lives.
Here is an
example of what I mean which says it all, from an article about
Homeopathy (energy
water) in Psychology
Today (March/April
2004)
www.psychologytoday.com/htdocs/prod/ptoarticle/pto-20040302-000003.asp
“Amy Lansky
didn’t care that homeopathy is one of
nine months of
homeopathic treatment, Max was a
different child:
talkative, active, sociable and
popular. Under Melnychuk’s
guidance, Lansky gradually
decreased his dose of Carcinosin,
eventually
discontinuing it. Max
continued to improve. By age
five, he was virtually
indistinguishable from any
other kid. “He
now sees Melnychuk
maybe twice a year,”
says Lansky.
“As far as I’m concerned, he’s
cured.”
Max’s
experience led Lansky to quit her job and study
homeopathy full-time.
Last fall, she hung out a
shingle. “As a
scientist,” she explains, “I recognize
that homeopathy is
implausible. But I’ve seen it cure
my
son.””
Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page