Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page
Debunking PseudoSkeptical Arguments of Paranormal Debunkers
Section
II: Arguments Against
Specific Paranormal Claims
Argument # 16: Psychics
and mediums
use cold reading tricks and general guesses, not psychic
powers.
Skeptics
claim that psychics
and mediums use cold reading
to pick up clues about clients and amaze
them.
First, let me explain what
cold
reading is, then I’ll explain why it does not account for all
psychic
readings.
Cold reading
is an umbrella term for a series of techniques used by
magicians and mentalists (specialists in mind reading tricks) to employ
a
variety of methods to gain information and clues about a client for a
reading.
These methods include but are
not limited to: fishing for clues by asking questions, listening to
everything
a client says to get clues, making general or vague statements that
most people
interpret as hits, observing facial expressions and body language as
you make
statements, analyzing clues from a person’s dress and
demeanor, and other
mentalist tricks, etc. (despite what politically correct people say, it
is a
fact that there are many things you can tell about a person based on
their
looks, even from a photograph)
Even the
smallest things can give a trained cold reader important clues about
you.
In conjunction with cold
reading, another technique
known as “hot reading” can also be used.
Hot reading
is the technique
of investigating a person’s background and records prior to a
psychic reading
to obtain specific information about them.
Mentalists performing in
stage shows often use hot reading to obtain
prior information about audience members beforehand, such as maiden
names,
former addresses, etc.
Cold reading can
be used both consciously and unconsciously.
Some cold readers knowingly
use and develop their cold reading
techniques like a skill or art.
Others
may subconsciously use cold reading techniques, attributing it to
intuition or
psychic abilities, thus deluding themselves as well as their clients.
Although
it is true that
there are many frauds out there who use cold reading the way mentalists
and
magicians do, it doesn’t mean that every psychic is a fraud. That
would be like finding some counterfeit
money and concluding that all money was counterfeit.
Magic
tricks and genuine psychic abilities
are two separate fields, rather than the same as skeptics like Randi
would have
you believe.
Of course, frauds and con
artists are part of every kind of business, not just in the psychic
medium
field.
The problem with the cold
reading/hot reading explanation is that for many accounts of psychic
readings
(including some of my own) the techniques do not account for the
specific
information attained.
For example, some
psychic can tell you very specific things about you without asking you
any
questions, which rules out the “fishing for clues”
technique.
If neither they nor any of
their accomplices
talked to you beforehand, then that would also rule out the same
technique.
If the clues they gave could
not have been gained from anything in your appearance, then that would
rule out
the “visual clues” technique as well.
For instance, if you were
told the location you grew up in, your former
last name, or an event in your past that doesn’t show in your
appearance, then
the visual clues technique could not account for it.
In
addition, if the psychic who told you
these things didn’t know you were coming beforehand, as in a
walk-in psychic
fair, then that would rule out hot reading too.
Unfortunately for skeptics,
there are many cases of psychic readings
where all of the above were ruled out.
Therefore, cold/hot reading
cannot account for every case.
In such cases, the skeptic is
left without
explanations, but often continue to insist that the client must have
given away
some kind of clue, and demand that this be disproved first before
imposing any
claim of genuine psychic ability at work.
However, if it was a past
event, it is impossible to prove either way
unless you could travel back in time, so the skeptic has their excuse
to deny
once again.
Let me
give some examples of
psychic readings that I know of where cold reading was either
impossible or too
unlikely to be a valid explanation:
1) One
of my own examples is from a psychic reading I got from my
acting teacher’s mom about a year and a half ago.
During
rehearsals one time, I heard that my
teacher’s mom, Pearl, did psychic readings as a personal
favor to people.
A fellow student mentioned
that she was
amazed because
To my
astonishment, she said
that she sensed that I had a tragic period in my life when I was 9
years
old.
Somehow she could feel the
emotional scars there, not from my palm lines she said, but from the
vibrations
she felt.
This was very true because
that year was the worst year of my life, besides the year that I was 16. Random
guessing, although possible, was
unlikely because if she had guessed any other year beside 9 and 16, she
would
have been wrong.
By guessing, she would
have had a 2/25 chance of being right.
Furthermore, guessing was
even more unlikely since she guessed the
tragic year of the girl before me correctly too. Generalized
guessing was also unlikely
because if
When
I mentioned that all I was asked was my birth date, they insisted that
facial
expressions and body language were part of cold reading too. But
when I challenged them to explain how my
facial expressions or body language told her that I had a tragedy at 9
years
old, they had no explanation except to repeat the same thing again and
dodge
the question.
They were stumped! What
the odds that
Later, when I
brought this up to a skeptic, he suggested that since this occurred a
year
and a half ago, my memory of the events might not be accurate. However,
I debunked his false memory theory
on the spot by stating that I still had the message board post I wrote
right
after the event, which contained the SAME details that I remember now. After
his case was blown, he suggested that
if they were a school, they would have records of my past.
When
I told him that it was not an actual
school, but a community theater acting class that had no records on me,
(and didn’t
need them either) he was at a loss for explanations and challenged me
to prove
that I had an accurate memory of every detail that happened, including
the
color of the drapes, chairs, etc. and that I had a detailed transcript
of the
whole thing, or else I could not rule out that all other possible
non-psychic
explanations.
This was of course
ridiculous because it would be like asking someone to remember the
license
plate number of every car that they drove by this morning, or what they
did 257
days ago at 3:15pm, for instance. He
was
obviously getting desperate for explanations here and to go so far as
to
challenge me to prove trivial things to put the burden of proof on me. This
was obviously the work of a closed and
biased mind.
Besides,
2) These
next two accounts were recently related to me from my
dad.
The first one involves a
psychic
that he, my mom, and her friend met a long time ago back in Taiwan (I
think it
was during the early 70's, before I was born)
While they were passing
through a city that they rarely visited, they
came upon a line of people waiting for a reading from this blind
psychic who
gave readings based on voices he heard.
My mom decided on the spur of
the moment to get a reading from him.
Without fishing for any
clues, one
of the first things that he told her was that when she was a child, her
mom
tried to give her away for adoption to another family, but she later
ran back
home, which was TRUE!
My mom was very
amazed at the time, and her friend was so amazed that she tried to push
my mom
aside to get a reading too.
He also told
her other things that were true too.
Now, being
given away for
adoption and then running back home is not a
generalized guess that would fit anybody, only a few people. Both
my parents and my mom's friend can
confirm this story, so it’s not like it was made up out of
obscurity.
Furthermore, since this
reading was on the
spot and not prearranged, there was no possibility of hot reading or
background
checking.
And since this was in a city
where she rarely visited, there wouldn’t have been people who
knew her there
that could have told the psychic about her beforehand.
The
skeptics I related this to tried to claim
that since this occurred decades ago, the memories of the three people
involved
can’t be counted on to be reliable.
However, as mentioned in the
rebuttal to Argument
# 6, since this
was a shocking event, the memory of it is the same it was at the time
it
happened (as in my own example above).
Furthermore, since these type
of amazing psychic readings already occur
in modern times anyway, why couldn’t they have occurred back
then as well?
3) Here's
the second story that happened more recently. A
few years ago, my dad and a coworker,
Eileen, went to a psychic fair.
They
picked one of the psychics there for a reading and sat down. Immediately
the psychic told Eileen that “You
are in the process of moving” which was true because Eileen
had already sold
her house and was in fact in the process of moving.
Struck
with amazement, they arranged for a
personal reading later on with the psychic.
Skeptics I told this to
claimed that the phrase “You are in the process
of moving” was vague and could be interpreted in many ways
related to changes
in life.
However, whenever
I’ve heard
that phrase used, it usually referred to moving residence.
In
either case, even if it was a general
phrase, that still doesn’t mean that it was just a guess.
4) This
case I heard on my email discussion list is a very
extraordinary one.
Edith, whom has a
history of giving good spiritual advice, related this story:
“I
went to a Psychic fair in Chicago, all
by myself, on the spur of the moment, then looked around and saw a
little old
man sitting all by himself, a bit away from all others. I walked over
to him,
asked him how much he charges, and sat down.
He did not even ask my birth
date or any other question, and began to
talk about my children.
He said I
had two children, a boy and a
girl. I told him that this is not true, that I have two girls. He
said that he knows different, which really
upset me.
He went on saying that the
boy
died right after his birth, and that my girl had died a few years back
in a
tragic incident, and that the second girl is not my own girl, but is
adopted.
He was right, because I had
to
admit that I no longer thought of my little boy any longer as a son.
(
he was born 37 years earlier, prematurely in the 6th month of
pregnancy, and
had only lived 25 minutes.)
He then
told me that I am writing a
Novel, and began to outline the story, naming the character in the
Novel by
name, their roles, and how they related to each other, and the time
frame of
the story. He was right in the smallest detail, better than I could
describe
myself, having written it.
He told me
that I would be teaching many
people, and that people will come to my house to ask for lessons, but
it would
be out of the State, in the South.
(The
South was the last place on earth I would want to live at that time. Neither
would I want to leave my job, or my
dream house that I had purchased only a short time before.
It
was months later that my husband was
suddenly transferred to
There were
many other events he told me
from my childhood, early adulthood, my former marriage, all accurate in
every aspect
and every little detail. He described the house I was born in, a house
I had
never again seen in over 46 years, and I had to look on an old
photograph to
check the details he described, of which I was no longer aware of.
He was
correct.
He took a pen and wrote my
father's name, in
my father's handwriting. (The
old German
script, which is no longer in use, called: Hohe Stolze.)
Now, I
don't expect you to believe me,
and I don't care one way or another, whatever explanation you come up
with for
all that, it does not change one tittle.
Just
remember one thing:
I had never been in
But most of
all, that it was I who chose
this particular Psychic among all others.
I had been
to other Psychics, at
different times, in different States and different countries, all
without
appointments, and without recommendations by anyone I knew, who had
been most
accurate in everything they said, three of which described the same
Novel I
spoke of earlier, one spoke of a book I had written many years earlier,
even
how many pages the manuscript was, how many chapters, and the general
contents
of it.”
5)
Besides
using
professional human psychics, one can use divination to obtain
information from
beyond the 5 senses, as in this case:
“I was
indirectly at a Ouija board sitting once when was 11 years old without
any
doubt it predicted the future accurately of myself my sisters and my
brother. It spelled out whom we would marry and at
what age and in
what order. Even how many kids we would each have? I
was extremely good at
remembering all the information, as it was not the sort of thing we
ever did as
a family and it intrigued me. Of course did not realise how
profound that
experience was and how it has made me question all sorts of theories
and
concepts. I did not dwell on it too much at the time
not really
thinking there could be any truth in it. In my twenties we
tried for the
third baby and found had developed endometriosis had an emergency
hysterectomy.
I didn't believe it at all would never have 3 kids and recall thinking
when I
was 11 how sad it felt, as would only have two kids and the
rest of my
sisters and my brother would have more than me? They had what it
predicted? The
information it gave was accurate.
The things
happened in the order it stated.ie. I got married when it said and
before my
sister who was a year older than me. Which at the time I joked about
most
eleven-year-old girls just automatically think an older sister will
marry
before them?
I also recall its predicted
I would marry just before my 22nd birthday that happened. It stated our
future
husbands surnames? (No it’s not false memory syndrome or us
deliberately
searching out folk with those names (believe me have gone through a
long list
of 'how's & why's and where's and when?)
Believe me
was too busy working to give it too much thought to any of it and RING
is not
by any means a common surname. (Neither is 'Ashby' my
sister’s surname.) At the
time I thought RING when asked about whom I would marry was referring
to a
'ring' as one being placed in marriage on the finger never realising
until
years later after was married sometime that it predicted my future
name? I even
recall it predicting my sisters future surnames now I am sure we all
lead far
to busy lives to be subliminally searching for names mentioned? The
sequence of
events date’s surnames the order of events actually occurred
as it stated?
There's a lot of things have thought about here 'where did that
information
come from'? Did we ourselves produce it and how? It predicted my
brother would
be shot (we asked where? It said 'trunk') that is the only thing
that’s not
transpired to date.
If it does
occur I won't panic as it stated he would not die.
This is
one of many very strange things that have experienced. If the
information was
correct for one of us then
perhaps it
could have been coincidence or subliminal brain - consciousness
processes in
operation? Who knows?
The fact
(and it is fact sorry you have to take my word for that) (if you can't
then
'postulate' the concept for a moment
and
try to focus on explanations?
We only
ever did this once it was not a usual occurrence (hence why was so
intrigued).
I must admit
Have no
intention of ever doing it again either.
I very
cheekily asked (being poor as you do) when would we win the Football
Pools and
it just kept going to XXXXXXX
although I
did not count them so am lost as to that particular answer? This
occurred in
1974 and it has since made me
question
many things.
This is
one of many experiences that have kept me focused on gathering answers
that
could possibly account for
how these
things occur? It’s most interesting.”
As you can
see, the facts in
these incidents don’t suggest in any way that cold/hot
reading was
involved.
Psychic reading accounts like
this are abundant and come from people of all walks of life. Anyone
who does a little research could come
up with accounts like these.
In 2000,
famous
mediums were tested under controlled conditions by Dr.
Gary Schwartz of the Human
Energy Systems Laboratory at the
Even more
astonishing,
in the second experiment involving a different group of mediums and
sitters,
the mediums were not allowed to ask anything at all, yet they STILL
retained
the same level of accuracy as the mediums in the first experiment! A
report on these experiments was published
in the January 2001 issue of the Journal
of the Society for Psychical Research.
The report, Accuracy and
Replicability of Anomalous After-Death Communication Across Highly
Skilled
Mediums contains the following
key excerpts:
“In a
replication and extension experiment, medium’s
average accuracy an initial ten minute period that did not
allow yes-no questioning was 77%."
"The data suggest that
highly skilled mediums
are able to obtain accurate (p less than one in ten million) and
replicable
information.
Since factors of fraud,
error, and statistical coincidence can
not explain
the present findings, other possible mechanisms should be
considered in future research.
These
include telepathy, super psi, and survival of consciousness
after-death."
"It can be seen that the
mediums varied in the
number of total items they obtained and the number of questions they
asked.
Medium 1, in particular, generated over 130 specific
pieces of
information yet asked only 5 questions,
4 of which (80%) were answered
yes."
"Medium 1, who obtained
the lowest score (80%),
only asked a total of five questions.
Hence, it
is impossible to
claim that medium 1’s percent accuracy ratings (see below)
were due to
"cold reading" and "fishing for information.""
"Though names were rated
least accurately, the
magnitude of the accuracy was still surprisingly high (67% for sitter
one and
76% for sitter two).
Initials received
higher percent accuracy scores (90% for sitter one and 100% for sitter
two).
Personal temperament
information
was very accurately reported (95% for sitter one and 93% for sitter
two)."
"For the first ten
minutes, the mediums were
instructed to receive whatever information they could about the
deceased and
share this information out loud. They
were not allowed to ask any
questions of the sitters.
The sitters
were instructed to remain silent...
The content of these
two readings was dramatic.
Information
about the deceased son and dog were again replicated by both mediums. However,
both mediums also received
information about the recently deceased husband. Medium
2 reported being confused, saying
"I keep hearing Michael times two, Michael times two."
The
father’s name was Michael, the son’s
name was Michael, Jr."
"The two
right bars display the percent + accuracy ratings for the silent and
questioning periods, combining the data for mediums 1 and 2. The
average accuracy for the silent periods was 77% and for the questioning
period,
85%. The
total number of items
received during the silent period was 64, the total during the
questioning
period was 157. The
difference between the silent and questioning periods in percent
accuracy was not statistically significant."
"The accuracy of mediums
1 and 2 was replicated,
including during a ten minute silent period when no
questioning was allowed. New information
about the
deceased husband was received by both
mediums.
More information was obtained
during the questioning period than the silent period, and the accuracy
ratings
were somewhat higher.
However,
detailed information was
obtained during the silent periods when no "cold reading" was
possible."
"These two experiments
provide quantitative data
that are consistent with the hypothesis that some form of anomalous
information
retrieval was occurring in these skilled mediums.
Traditional
hypotheses of fraud, subtle
cueing, and statistical coincidence, are improbable explanations of the
total
set of observations reported here."
"The present findings do
not speak directly to
the mechanism (s) of anomalous information retrieval observed. However,
the apparent desynchrony of the
medium’s ECG’s with the sitter’s ECG
during the reading periods compared to the
baseline periods is inconsistent with a "telepathy with the sitter"
interpretation of the findings."
"...However, it
is important to mention
that the mediums spoke remarkably quickly and generated
a surprisingly large number of specific facts."
"For the first sitter,
all five mediums obtained
information about a deceased son. Three
of the five mediums heard the initial M for the son, one said the name
Michael.
None gave a false initial or
name for the
son. Also,
none obtained information about a
deceased daughter (her son did die, her daughter was alive)."
"Qualitative Example II:
Receiving
accurate information days before
the readings
One of the mediums
purportedly received communication
from the deceased mother of one of the sitters a few days before
traveling to
When the reading was
about to begin with the sitter,
the medium unexpectedly reported to the experimenters that he had
forgotten to
bring into the laboratory a present he had brought for this sitter from
her
deceased mother.
Surprised by the claim
of such a gift, we instructed the medium that he could have his
assistant bring
it in after the reading had officially ended and the formal data had
been
collected.
The gift was brought into
the laboratory at the end
of the session and passed around the screen to the sitter.
Upon
opening the present, the sitter, in
tears, confirmed that this was a special prayer her mother had taught
her as a
child.
Moreover, she shared that she
silently continued to say this prayer for her deceased mother.
Since the medium
purportedly did not know who the
sitters were ahead of time, and also did not know who was behind the
screen,
the observation of the medium receiving anomalous communication three
days
before the experiment and giving this particular sitter this particular
gift
raises challenging questions..."
Since they
were published in
the Jan 2001 issue of Journal
of Parapsychology, more experiments have been done and can now be read
about in
Dr. Schwartz's book The
Afterlife Experiments : Breakthrough Scientific Evidence of Life After
Death.
Previous
Page
Back
to
Table of Contents
Next
Page