Your claim is that people should be interested in what you are interested in. If someone does not show interest in something you are interested in, then that is wrong.
That's a bit arrogant.
The True Masters of the Pseudo-Skeptics
34 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: The True Masters of the Pseudo-SkepticsYour claim is that people should be interested in what you are interested in. If someone does not show interest in something you are interested in, then that is wrong.
That's a bit arrogant. Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: The True Masters of the Pseudo-SkepticsGood to see you post ProfWag.
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: The True Masters of the Pseudo-SkepticsMaybe there's some numerological formula that changes the words "great deal" into 64? Could be?
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: The True Masters of the Pseudo-SkepticsWas that astrological services or astrological services?
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: The True Masters of the Pseudo-SkepticsI was just trying to verify that the services were astrological in nature.
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: The True Masters of the Pseudo-SkepticsNow that's the $64 question.
Re: The True Masters of the Pseudo-Skeptics Ok, I'm frightened!
I just read a mile long post beating a drum about how the WTC Towers were blown up and not hit my airliners I mean c'mon... Bush was crooked as hell but I just can see him being that calloused Ok... he wanted to play G.I. Joe and rewrite his Vietnam era screw-ups as a "pilot" so maybe he thought he needed a bogus war to do that... I'm still blaming his Dick... Chaney... Ok... the facts of life are quite simple; 9/11 happened and it wasn't a conspiracy in the sense that's being presented here. IF (a very big "if") any conspiracy existed it is akin to the one tied to FDR and Pearl Harbor... it was known to be coming and nothing was done deliberately, so as to gain public support for gearing up the Industrial Military might of the Nation... that I could possibly buy into. But please don't try selling me swamp land or any other flavor of snake oil. The Flag on the Moon Waving in the Breeze? I'd like to know how you are seeing that to know. There were no web cams placed up there by Armstrong & Co. and I've yet to hear about any current tech that's taken a curious look... not at the cost of millions of dollars. But when it comes to the lunar landings themselves, I am compelled to believe they really happened... we may have been helped in the effort by ET, but we got there and back and then did it again... and we're presently gearing up to not just go back but to establish working communities via private and government based entities. As I've said on other topics; weigh it all and learn from either side all you can and be willing to accept the perspectives you may not want to buy into but at the end of the day, realize that the right answer is generally located somewhere in the middle of the extremes. IN the case of 9/11 we did know something was in the works... we know that the Idiot ignored all the warnings given him by the Clinton Admin and his own Advisors... we also know that he was "promising" a was in Iraq to all his oil company supporters well before the "elections" and some rather interesting tactics took place as part of that election, to insure his being on the throne and able to make that happen... or as they say "follow the money". Again... I feel this to be a far more believable supposition than squibs on windows and unseen detonator packs properly placed throughout the that complex so as to create the level of damage that occurred. Trust me... you wouldn't be able to ignore the amount of explosives that would require not to mention the months of planning, pre-staging work, etc. But what do I know, I was just an explosive dude with an A-6 Squadron
34 posts
• Page 2 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Return to PseudoSkeptic Fallacies Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests |
|