View Active Topics          View Your Posts          Latest 100 Topics          Switch to Mobile

Artificial Moon - David Icke

Discuss Science, Alternative Science and Suppressed Research.

Artificial Moon - David Icke

Postby Scepcop » 04 Jun 2011, 21:58

From David Icke's newsletter:

David Icke Newsletter Preview

WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT OUR SOLAR SYSTEM? ...

Image

… NEXT TO NOTHING

The David Icke Newsletter Goes Out On Sunday

There is one heck of a story to be told about what is happening on, and especially inside the Moon. I have been connecting the dots with regard to the Moon for the best part of two years and it is clear to me that it is not a ‘natural’ body, but a control system that is manipulating our sense of reality to make us the slave race of those who are doing it.

The anomalies and mysteries surrounding the Moon are legion and its origin (if you ignore the official and untenable assumptions) is unknown. It is a massive body to be a satellite of a small planet like Earth. It is 2,160 miles in diameter, bigger than Pluto and the fifth largest moon in the solar system. By rights, it shouldn't be there and as Irwin Shapiro, from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, said: ‘The best explanation for the Moon is observational error – the Moon doesn't exist.’

The Moon is not ‘real’? What? Yes, but hold on. There is an important point to make here. If people are going to grasp what is happening they need a blank sheet of paper when it comes to judging what is meant by ‘big’. Remember that humans have been held in a mind prison for aeons. We don’t know what ‘big’ is, or how such structures and technology of extraordinary size (to us) can be produced.

We have been living in a tiny, tiny perception bubble and the cutting edge of human technology (that we see) is the Stone Age in terms of what is possible. Once you cross the Rubicon and enter an understanding of what reality truly is and how it works, you can move forward in enormous leaps technologically and in others ways. This is what we are dealing with here. Technological capability that makes a lot of science fiction look tame. Imagine you are sitting in a cave knocking rocks together and someone told you it was possible to build a Jumbo Jet or a Space Shuttle. You’d say it was impossible, crazy. The guy’s been drinking too much mammoth juice.

But this is the kind of chasm that people are being challenged to cross in terms of their perception of the possible. The suppression of information, and so the suppression of the perception of the possible, is one of the great ways the true scale of the conspiracy stays hidden. It means that when people like me say this or that is happening, the perception censor kicks in and says: ‘That’s not possible.’ No, it is not possible for us to do it. Others can do it and they are.

Image
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3258
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Artificial Moon - David Icke

Postby Arouet » 05 Jun 2011, 23:28

Do you agree with David Icke Scepcop?
User avatar
Arouet
 
Posts: 2544
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 03:07

Re: Artificial Moon - David Icke

Postby Craig Browning » 06 Jun 2011, 21:49

I love this line. . . The anomalies and mysteries surrounding the Moon are legion and its origin

You'd think the brainiac would at least use the right word to describe what he's stirring paranoia about. . . if these mysteries are in fact "legion" where's the army in question? :twisted:

Yes, the moon is an "artificial satellite" in that it wasn't there originally but came alone as the earth got struck by an asteroid or maybe even another planet waaaaay back when everything was spinning about and forming. It is not however the "Death Star" or any kind of "sending antenna" used to control us, it's a bit "rock" that has form, limited atmosphere, its own gravity and is in an outward expanding orbit around the earth which will ultimately cause us to lose its all so necessary physical influence on our little orb. . . then again, there won't be much life left on earth by the time the moon finally leaves our orbit path, the wobble and other physics will insure such. . . but we have a good half-million or so years before that happens. :D

I think Mr. Icke needs to stop sewing the 2001 Space Odyssey into his "science" -- there are no monoliths on the moon, no secret (hidden) societies or technology resting beneath its surface and before we go there. . .Mars is likewise a doubtful alternative here.

Now, in Defense of this Supposition. . .
There are some very ancient teachings within various aboriginal cultures that do suggest that human life as it is known today, is the result of either the earth being set aside as a kind of "prison" such as was done with Australia and other lands in which penal colonies were set and a society grew up and out of them over time. There is likewise anthropological data that supports the idea that an extra-terrestrial life form used the earth as a kind of "life boat" at one point, about 10,000 years or so ago, via which their DNA was mixed with that of the hominid creatures that were natural to the planet. Unfortunately there hasn't been a single bit of supportive data discovered on either ancient theory, just a huge puzzle given how well the ancient shaman mapped the skies and understood not just the cycles and movements of our planetary system but a much wider level of cosmic mechanics, much of which has only been "discovered" and thus confirmed through NASA and other space agencies in the past 25 years. So maybe there is more to the proverbial portrait that's yet to be learnt. . . for now however such concepts must be laid to the side with the tales of Lemuria, Atlantis and Shangri-La . :ugeek:
User avatar
Craig Browning
 
Posts: 1526
Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 05:20
Location: Northampton, MA

Re: Artificial Moon - David Icke

Postby Nostradamus » 02 Nov 2011, 23:52

By rights, it shouldn't be there and as Irwin Shapiro, from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, said: ‘The best explanation for the Moon is observational error – the Moon doesn't exist.’

I was unable to find the context in which this was supposedly stated.

Knowing what a fraud Icke is I suspect that this may never have been stated by Shapiro.

You simply can not trust Icke
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
User avatar
Nostradamus
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 14:08


Return to Science / Alternative Science / Suppressed Research

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron