Discuss General Topics.
by Indigo Child » 26 Jun 2010, 09:25
My teacher once said to me, and his words ring very true. If you look at only 500 years of history, it is clear the West is at the top of civilisation. If you look at 5000 years of history is is clear that the East is at the top of civilisation and the West has barely even started to walk. Everything that characterizes civilisation first appears in the East in the history of civilisation. Planned cities, philosophy, science, industry, roads, hospitals, democracy, iron, steel, literature, ecology, chemistry arts, sanitation, engineering, medicine etc etc
The East is far older than the West is and far more wiser. It is only in modern times due to colonialism that the East has been set back and is redeveloping. However, it won't take long, before the East is back at the top.
-
Indigo Child
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 22 May 2009, 08:01
by ProfWag » 26 Jun 2010, 19:13
-
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by really? » 26 Jun 2010, 19:42
-
really?
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: 06 Mar 2010, 20:58
by Indigo Child » 28 Jun 2010, 04:10
Again, I not going to enter into a pointless debate on the semantics of cure vs treatment. I have shown evidence now that Yoga and Ayurveda can reverse many diseases and in some cases have even cured disease. In the case of diabetes, the article showed how the person insulin levels retured to normal and they did not require any medication anymore. In the case of AIDS, the artcle showed that the doctor was able to succesfully reverse AIDS and the person tested for HIV negative after the treatment. In the cancer articles, it showed how several people were cured of cancer using the mercury and metal based medicine, when the allopathic doctors had given up on them.
Stop pretending like you've not been given this information.
Based on the evidence we have so far Ayurveda and Yoga do a far better job in treating AND curing disease than allopathic medicine. Case closed.
-
Indigo Child
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 22 May 2009, 08:01
by really? » 28 Jun 2010, 05:39
-
really?
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: 06 Mar 2010, 20:58
by ProfWag » 29 Jun 2010, 21:56
Indigo Child, you say you are a skeptic. I say if you keep posting these articles without giving them proper representation, then you are definitely not a skeptic. You say ayurveda cured AIDS, "case closed." Well, let's just look at the article you presented for your evidence. Here is a quote from that article: "Despite this, whether AIDS and Rajayakshma are the same disease is a contentious issue. Dr Shanthakumar, however, believes they are and says the treatment used for Rajayakshma can be applied fruitfully in the war against HIV/AIDS." First, there's not even solid evidence that what he is treating is AIDS! Most think it's something called "Rajayakshma." Next, I did a google search on your Dr G. Shanthakumar and AIDS or ayurveda. Know what I found? Nothing in the first 10 pages of hits. If he is doing what you claim, then you are going to have to present better evidence before we tell the world there is a Doctor in India who has the cure. Telling us AIDS can be cured, "case closed" is pretty irresponsible of you, I think.
-
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by really? » 30 Jun 2010, 07:44
-
really?
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: 06 Mar 2010, 20:58
by ProfWag » 30 Jun 2010, 09:33
-
ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by really? » 01 Jul 2010, 05:39
-
really?
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: 06 Mar 2010, 20:58
by Indigo Child » 01 Jul 2010, 05:54
It sounds like to me that Rajayksha simply means the worst of diseases, and some people have interpreted this to be tuberculosis. Incidentally, AIDS victims will almost most likely develop tuberculosis, so there is a connection there. Dr Shantakumar is basing his conclusion that Rajayskha is AIDS based on the symptoms and the common causes for the disease.
The major symptoms are:
(1) drastic loss of weight (2) fatigue and lethargy (3) susceptibility to allergies and contagious diseases (4) skin irritations (5) bronchial disorders, often leading to tuberculosis of the lungs (6) damage to intestinal flora resulting in diarrhoea, dysentery, gastritis and (7) wide fluctuations in body temperature.
Significantly, the root causes of this disease are:
(1) unhygienic sexual practices such as anal intercourse (2) indiscriminate intercourse with multiple partners (3) not cleaning the genitals after coitus (4) washing the body with contaminated or dirty water (5) bestiality (6) contaminated blood.
I can see why Dr Shantakumar thinks that Rajayksha and AIDS must be the same disease. But what is even more important here is, Dr Shantakumar has allegedly cured an AIDS victim using the Ayurvedic treatment for Rajayksha and treated dozens more. If Rajayksha is not AIDS, then why are AIDS victims responding well to treatment of Rajayksha?
-
Indigo Child
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 22 May 2009, 08:01
by really? » 01 Jul 2010, 09:31
-
really?
-
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: 06 Mar 2010, 20:58
by Indigo Child » 01 Jul 2010, 09:43
Try again.
Dr Shantakumar has allegedly cured an AIDS victim using the Ayurvedic treatment for Rajayksha and treated dozens more. If Rajayksha is not AIDS, then why are AIDS victims responding well to treatment of Rajayksha?
-
Indigo Child
-
- Posts: 327
- Joined: 22 May 2009, 08:01
Return to General Discussions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
|
|