View Active Topics          View Your Posts          Latest 100 Topics          Switch to Mobile

Why there SHOULD have been a blast crater beneath the LEM!

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

Why there SHOULD have been a blast crater beneath the LEM!

Postby Scepcop » 03 Feb 2010, 02:27

Jarrah White thoroughly explains here why there should have been a blast crater under the LEM and debunks the explanations why there wasn't one. It is very thorough and references documented scientific facts and experiments. This one is a scholarly masterpiece!

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 3259
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Why there SHOULD have been a blast crater beneath the LEM!

Postby Nostradamus » 28 Feb 2010, 02:41

Another lame video :lol:

White shows his lack of knowledge by stating that 70 decibels is half that of a jet engine. What a laughable comment!
Decibels is a logarithmic scale. Here are examples:

70 decibels is moderate traffic; hair dryer
150 decibels is not a plane at rest as the video shows, but a jet during takeoff

liar liar pants on fire

Finally the video starts the real topic

There is the claim of forming a cloud of dust. No atmosphere sorry.

The real claim is that the removal of material should expose the bedrock. Did it? The video makes no comment one way or the other. Then the video uses Ralph magazine as a source. Ha Ha Ha.

The conclusion of this trash video is that an engine turned off must immediately turn off. Fuel and oxidizers in the line would not burn after the engine is turned off.

So why was Armstrong purposely commenting on the blast crater? That is a lesson for those that want to know. I know, because I followed the space program. I am well aware of the concerns with a moon landing and why the landing site was chosen. Nut cases like White don't want to people to know. Even Creationists will tell someone more of the story.

How interesting Creationists and moon hoaxers collide.
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
User avatar
Posts: 1761
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 14:08

Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests