View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

should i be talking to you people ??

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

should i be talking to you people ??

Postby brett » 10 Nov 2009, 00:53

this just up from the BBC - the new world order is upon us - we are being spied on - so i will have to watch who i associate with and which web sites i visit from now on :? ( especially which web sites i visit ................. thinks ) :lol: :lol: , so i dunno if i should be even talking to you dodgy characters :lol: :lol:

UK surveillance plan to go ahead
By Dominic Casciani
BBC News

The Home Office says it will push ahead with plans to ask communications firms to monitor all Internet use.

Ministers confirmed their intention despite concerns and opposition from some in the industry.

The proposals include asking firms to retain information on how people use social networks such as Facebook.

Some 40% of respondents to the Home Office's consultation opposed the plans - but ministers say communication interception needs to be updated.

Both the police and secret security services have legal powers in the UK to intercept communications in the interests of combating crime or threats to national security.

But the rules largely focus on communications over telephones and do not cover the whole range of internet communications now being used.

The Home Office says it wants to change the law to compel communication service providers (CSPs) to collect and retain records of communications from a wider range of internet sources, from social networks through to chatrooms and unorthodox methods, such as within online games.

Ministers say that they do not want to create a single government-owned database and only intend to ask CSPs to hold a record of a contact, rather than the actual contents of what was said.

Technically challenging

Police and other agencies would then be able to ask CSPs for information on when a communication was sent and between whom.

# More communication via computers rather than phones
# Companies won't always keep all data all the time
# Anonymity online masks criminal identities
# More online services provided from abroad
# Data held in many locations and difficult to find Source: Home Office consultation

In theory, law enforcement agencies will be able to link that information to specific devices such as an individual's smartphone or laptop.

The proposals are technically challenging, as they would require a CSP to sort and organise all third-party traffic coming and going through their systems. The estimated £2bn bill for the project includes compensation for the companies involved.

Home Office minister David Hanson said: "Communications data is crucial to the fight against crime and in keeping people safe. It is a highly technical area and one which demands a fine balance between privacy and maintaining the capabilities of the police and security services.

"The consultation showed widespread recognition of the importance of communications data in protecting the public and an appreciation of the challenges which rapidly changing technology poses.

"We will now work with communications service providers and others to develop these proposals, and aim to introduce necessary legislation as soon as possible."

Opposition and concern

The consultation results reveal that 90 of the 221 responses opposed the basic principles that the government should be seeking a method to retain or look at the data.

The Home Office said that there was a "widespread but not unanimous" recognition of the role of data in protecting the public. But many concerns related to the detail of what would be done with the information.

Christopher Graham, the Information Commissioner responsible for overseeing the protection of private information, told the Home Office that while he recognised that the police needed to use communication data to stop crime, this in itself was not a justification to collect all possible data passing through the internet.

"The proposal represents a step change in the relationship between the citizen and the state," said Mr Graham.

"For the first time, this proposal is asking CSPs to collect and create information they would not have previously held and to go further in conducting additional processing on that information.

"Evidence for this proposal must be available to demonstrate that such a step change is necessary and proportionate."
Story from BBC NEWS: ... 350660.stm

Published: 2009/11/09 13:57:45 GMT


see Orwell was right - big brother IS watching us :o
LIFE - just filling the bits between birth, death and taxes
User avatar
Posts: 436
Joined: 06 Aug 2009, 22:23
Location: Plymouth UK

Re: should i be talking to you people ??

Postby NinjaPuppy » 10 Nov 2009, 01:35

Oh well.... I guess they will no longer need to monitor me via my cable TV any longer. :lol:
User avatar
Posts: 4002
Joined: 28 Jul 2009, 20:44

Re: should i be talking to you people ??

Postby ciscop » 10 Nov 2009, 03:56

nah i think we are safe
the ones in thatlist gotta be highflyer and scescop
since they post so many lies and missinformation about usa´s government
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
User avatar
Posts: 1423
Joined: 22 Jul 2009, 12:04

Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest