The main points from your arguments stundie are this:
1) Comparing the WTCs 1 & 2 with any other building collapse can't be done. Nothing like it has ever happened before.
2) The sound of a building coming down on top of itself is going to sound like a lot of explosions because, essentially, it is. Clap your hands together and you'll see what I mean about air releasing out the side. Just because some firemen said it sounded like explosions doesn't mean the building was pre-wired for an implosion. I think that if I were anywhere near Manhatten that day when the buildings fell, it would have woken me out of a deep sleep if you know what I mean.
3) WTC had a Hell of a lot of fire damage. Firemen removed the people hours before it fell because they could tell the structure was not sound. The front of the building especially had sustained a tremendous amount of structural damage. Think if the WTCs were a foot air pump you use to blow up airbeds, the resulting wind would be quite forceful. That alone makes WTC 7 a bit different than the other buildings which didn't have nearby buildings collapse before they fell.
Adding those 3 points up equals: I just don't see any mystery surounding the collapse of the WTCs 1,2, or 7 from the points that have recently been presented.
P.S. I apologize for the grade remark, stundie. Looking back, it was kind of rude of me and you haven't deserved that treatment from me. Yet...