View Active Topics          Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts          Switch to Mobile

Princess Diana Assassination Conspiracy

Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.

Princess Diana Assassination Conspiracy

Postby Scepcop » 02 May 2010, 03:18

Discovery Channel program that presents evidence that Princess Diana was murdered:





“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29






Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby Scepcop » 02 May 2010, 03:22

MI 5 agent Annie Machon testifies that Princess Diana was probably killed by a plot she knew about.



Breaking new info about the Diana car crash evidence:

“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby Nostradamus » 02 May 2010, 06:07

I got a kick out of the videos. After 3 shows the discovery show ends by backing off of every claim it made.

If I were a conspiracy junkie I'd be wondering why they did that. Could it be that the producers of the show are in fact affiliated with the NWO? Could it be that this was all a straw man operation to make people overlook that Dodie (sp?) was the real target. Could the assassination of Dodie Fayez be the reason that Al Quaeda targeted the WTC? Could this be because Diane was secretly in contact with aliens on Nibiru planning a devastating assault on the fashion world in 2012?

The answers to all of these questions and many more when we come back from the next commercial break.
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
User avatar
Nostradamus
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 14:08

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby Craig Browning » 02 May 2010, 16:52

Nostradamus wrote:I got a kick out of the videos. After 3 shows the discovery show ends by backing off of every claim it made.

If I were a conspiracy junkie I'd be wondering why they did that. Could it be that the producers of the show are in fact affiliated with the NWO? Could it be that this was all a straw man operation to make people overlook that Dodie (sp?) was the real target. Could the assassination of Dodie Fayez be the reason that Al Quaeda targeted the WTC? Could this be because Diane was secretly in contact with aliens on Nibiru planning a devastating assault on the fashion world in 2012?

The answers to all of these questions and many more when we come back from the next commercial break.


OMG! I think we need to create a web site filled with high drama around this possibility... maybe drag in a reputable publication or two like the Enquirer and Star :mrgreen:
User avatar
Craig Browning
 
Posts: 1526
Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 05:20
Location: Northampton, MA

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby Scepcop » 05 May 2010, 05:14

Why do you authority worshippers have a hard time believing that Diana was murdered? It's not unreasonable. I mean, powerful people did want to kill her. British intelligence agents knew about it too. So it's a reasonable conclusion.

Plus the Royal Family has killed many people in the past.

It's just too convenient. You'd think that a Princess would have the best drivers and security. The probability of two people dying in a car crash is also low, especially in a tunnel.

The new evidence on Fox News also points to something suspicious too.

Why can't you authority worshippers accept that?
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby ProfWag » 05 May 2010, 05:23

I won't say that I think she was murdered, but won't say that she wasn't. I just haven't seen enough solid evidence other than the crash itself, but it could be out there. I can say that I've looked in, around, and on top of that tunnel and any car going quite fast could easily wipe out.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby Scepcop » 05 May 2010, 05:39

Nostradamus wrote:I got a kick out of the videos. After 3 shows the discovery show ends by backing off of every claim it made.

If I were a conspiracy junkie I'd be wondering why they did that. Could it be that the producers of the show are in fact affiliated with the NWO? Could it be that this was all a straw man operation to make people overlook that Dodie (sp?) was the real target. Could the assassination of Dodie Fayez be the reason that Al Quaeda targeted the WTC? Could this be because Diane was secretly in contact with aliens on Nibiru planning a devastating assault on the fashion world in 2012?

The answers to all of these questions and many more when we come back from the next commercial break.


You liar. At the end of part 3, the program does NOT back off on anything. It shows Diane saying that she will probably be killed someday, and then an MI 5 agent saying that he is sure that her murder was engineered, and then it ends with a typical closing. That's all. Nothing is backed off.

Shame on you for lying!
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby Nostradamus » 05 May 2010, 09:56

The probability of people dying in a car crash is really high when the car is doing over 60mph. Let's see they were doing what? Was it 90mph? Someone lived? Amazing. That's the story, not the deaths.

Why can't you conspiracy worshippers acknowledge that some ideas are just fantasies?

The videos end with the show putting the claims at arms length. Why do that unless you know that's closer to the truth than the suppositions made by the previous 25 minutes?
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
User avatar
Nostradamus
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 14:08

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby Nostradamus » 05 May 2010, 09:58

Actually you forgot to listen because they dump all of the stupid claims they made.

They do the sweet little washing of their hands of the claims at the end. So go back and listen as they do their fancy disclaimers.

Shame on you for not paying attention. Shame on you.
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
User avatar
Nostradamus
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 14:08

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby Scepcop » 08 May 2010, 03:37

Nostradamus wrote:The probability of people dying in a car crash is really high when the car is doing over 60mph. Let's see they were doing what? Was it 90mph? Someone lived? Amazing. That's the story, not the deaths.

Why can't you conspiracy worshippers acknowledge that some ideas are just fantasies?

The videos end with the show putting the claims at arms length. Why do that unless you know that's closer to the truth than the suppositions made by the previous 25 minutes?


Stop lying. Prove it. Quote the exact line from the end of the film that retracts all its arguments. There is no reason for a film to retract all its prior arguments in the same film. That is not logical.

You believe that whatever anyone in power says equals truth. You could not be more blind, and your critical thinking is zero.
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby Scepcop » 08 May 2010, 03:38

Nostradamus, if you can't add up the dots below, then you're dumb as hell. Seriously. Even a first grader could.

Sample from “The Biggest Secret”
By David Icke
------------------------------------------------------------------
Diana told Christine Fitzgerald in 1989 that they were going to kill her: “It sounded outlandish
at the time”, Christine said, “because she had the boys and they were little and I thought, no,
they need her to bring the boys up.” But there were to be many indications that Diana was
indeed in danger from the Windsors and the Brotherhood in general. In the late 1980s with her
marriage nothing more than a public show, Diana was having a relationship with her personal
detective, Barry Mannakee, but he died in a motorcycle ‘accident’ in 1988. By 1990, with the
Gulf War threatening, Diana was having a relationship with Captain James Hewitt.
One day, about this time, she went rushing into Christine’s healing centre in London in a
terrible state. Christine remembers: She was crying hysterically and I said ‘What’s the matter?’
You know it was dog’s died stuff, bottom lip out, full sob. She came galloping through the
door. I gave her rescue remedy, clutched her, hugged her, calmed her down, and said now tell
me what’s going on. ‘I can’t believe it, I can’t believe it, they killed him, they killed him’ she
sobbed. I said: ‘Who did they kill?’ She told me about her affair with the detective (Barry
Mannakee) and how he was decapitated on a motorbike and how she thought it was a terrible
accident. But now she knows the Royal Family killed him because Prince Charles’ senior
detective had just told her that if she didn’t cool it with Hewitt, the same would happen to him.
He told her she should not think that she was indispensable, either.”
Officially, Barry Mannakee died in a ‘road crash’. How dangerous the roads seem to be if the
royals don’t like you. Christine said that Diana was very much in love with Mannakee and she
had visited his grave regularly. Diana had, apparently, been unaware of his death at the time
until she was being driven with Prince Charles to the airport to fly to the Cannes Film Festival.
He waited until she was about to get out of the car in front of waiting photographers and he
said: “Oh, by the way, I got word from the Protection Unit yesterday that poor Barry
Mannakee was killed. Some sort of motorcycle accident. Terrible shame, isn’t it?” Diana burst
into tears, but Charles said sarcastically: “Let’s go darling, your press awaits you.”
I would emphasise again that the confirmation that Mannakee was murdered, and the personal
threat to Diana, came from Prince Charles’ senior detective, according to the Princess. Would
he be making statements and threats to her like that without the approval of Prince Charles?
Of course not. In 1998 in the Independent Television documentary, Diana – Secrets Of The
Crash, James Hewitt said that he too had been warned to stop seeing Diana or the
consequences would not be pleasant. He said:
“The telephone calls were anonymous, but left me in no doubt that they knew what the
situation was. They were threatening. They said it was not conducive to my health to continue
the relationship.”
He said that other warnings came from Diana’s personal police protection officers, the Royal
Household, and a member of the Royal Family, whom he would not name: “The (member of
the Royal Family) said your relationship is known about. It is not supported, we cannot be
responsible for your safety and security, and suggest that you curtail it forthwith.”
James Hewitt was further quoted in the London Times about these threats and his comments
supported completely the story Diana had told Christine Fitzgerald. Hewitt said that his
clearest warning came when he was told that he would suffer the same fate as Barry
Mannakee. Does anyone still believe that the Windsors and their networks were not involved in
the murder of Princess Diana? Or that they had prior knowledge and played an active role in
the decision to assassinate the mother of William and Harry?
------------------------------------------------------------------
“Devotion to the truth is the hallmark of morality; there is no greater, nobler, more heroic form of devotion than the act of a man who assumes the responsibility of thinking.” - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
User avatar
Scepcop
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3256
Joined: 16 May 2009, 07:29

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby ProfWag » 08 May 2010, 03:49

Scepcop wrote: You could not be more blind, and your critical thinking is zero.

Coming from someone who believes everything someone says because they appear to be honest or like a "grandmother-type," this tickles me.
User avatar
ProfWag
 
Posts: 3843
Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby Nostradamus » 10 May 2010, 10:23

Stop lying. Prove it. Quote the exact line from the end of the film that retracts all its arguments. There is no reason for a film to retract all its prior arguments in the same film. That is not logical.

You believe that whatever anyone in power says equals truth. You could not be more blind, and your critical thinking is zero.


Actually it is logical. It is the "don't sue me for making statements that are unlikely to be true" reaction to posting rubbish.

WWu777, your critical thinking is nonexistent, but that's ok. Is it your vibes sensor that you think allows you to avoid critical thinking? I can't recall what it was that you thought gave you the ability to discriminate one video from the next.
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
User avatar
Nostradamus
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 14:08

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby Nostradamus » 10 May 2010, 10:27

Nostradamus, if you can't add up the dots below, then you're dumb as hell. Seriously. Even a first grader could.

Sample from “The Biggest Secret”
By David Icke


Tough words there. Ouch.

Then you turn to this ding dong nut case that thinks the royal family are reptilians as proof of something. That's real critical thinking. Using the words of a person who is either a fraud or just psychotic. Good choice for evidence.
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
User avatar
Nostradamus
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 14:08

Re: Evidence that Princess Diana was murdered

Postby Nostradamus » 11 May 2010, 20:20

David Icke has a wonderful page over at the uncyclopedia. It's great for a laugh and sums up Icke's ridiculous claims.
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/David_Icke
I'll quote the tamer claims here. The really outrageous Icke-style claims are there for your reading pleasure.
Icke claims vindication for his views from a number of indisputable facts:
  • Alex Jones says it's all true.
  • That the royal family, George Bush, the Rothschild family and other wealthy people he claims are evil slobbering shapeshifting reptiles have not come forward for blood tests. He claims that Prince Charles uses his large ears as a communication device to communicate with his reptillian brethren on Sirius 6 in the Aformsa glaxy.
  • That no-one has tried to debunk Icke's well-researched claims except for "obvious purveyors of disinformation.
  • That everyone richer or more successful than him is an evil sex-obsessed reptile, hence being able to keep the public under their spell.

David Icke believes that all who do not believe in him and his message of "Infinite Love" are as follows:
  • "I couldn't care less what they say because they are a bunch of irrelevant, self-indulgent navel-contemplators who are doing the Illuminati's job for them by seeking to undermine any researcher who commits the crime of actually getting the information out to the mainstream public."
  • "They are just shepherds who hide behind bushes to spew out their hatreds from their gutless anonymity, despite the fact that they have no guts and, therefore, I'm a little unsure where the spew in question would have originated from. They have balls the size of processed peas and the word 'Homebase' does not even begin to suffice."
  • "Why should I, or anyone else, care what such people say about me or anyone? Well, obviously I care enough to make this statement, but the irony seems to have escaped me for the moment. They are utterly irrelevant and they have made themselves so by refusing to buy my self-published pamphlets."
Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
User avatar
Nostradamus
 
Posts: 1761
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 14:08

Next

Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests