Would JREF be worth having after proof has been provided ? Who would the skeptics hound then ?
I PREDICTED MASSIVE CHANGE, CONTROLLED CHANGE.
SCEPCOP Forum
Scientific Committee to Evaluate PseudoSkeptic Criticism of the Paranormal
Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
i think they would stand down ON THAT TOPIC
just by proving something you cant generalize right? by example if esp exists and is prooved then you cant go and said bigfoot and fairies and mediums exist so much bunk in this world  For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
yep
but for what i have seen skeptics can be relaxed if all paranormalist have is retarded guys like koenig, scam artists, dellusional people and guys that just want to hang to the fame of randi.. is really a safe bet for jref Last edited by ciscop on 09 Aug 2009, 09:57, edited 1 time in total.
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
yeah of course!!!
i would love it !! thats why i hang around.. i love the paranormal mostly is only stories, but i like the stories, i like how people think i have said it so many times the best kind of paranormal for me would be the psychic stuff (not speaking to the death.. more likely power of the mind) telekinesis, reading minds, esp, predicting future, telepathy.. whatever but all i have seen so far is bad science and quacks For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
so... do you have telekinesis powers?
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Would JREF stand down after Paranormal Proof
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
12 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to JREF / Randi Challenge Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests |
|
