911 "Nose Out" Plane Cameraman Suggests TV Fakery is Reality
Stood directly under the tower but sees no planeRe: Another amateur video eyewitness records and sees no plane911 "Nose Out" Plane Cameraman Suggests TV Fakery is Reality
Re: 9/11 TV FAKERY: AUGMENTED REALITYAnother cameraman cannot work out what he saw. "It looked like a special effect". FBI confiscates his film within seconds.
Re: Another amateur video eyewitness records and sees no planeEvan Fairbanks interview. Let's see what he has to say for himself?
Re: Another amateur video eyewitness records and sees no planeAIS - Can you please keep similar content together in a topic and not make a topic for each of these videos?
Re: Another amateur video eyewitness records and sees no planeREVISITING THE INTERVIEWS OF EVAN FAIRBANKS: HE IS TELLING LIES. LISTEN FOR YOURSELF!
Re: Stood directly under the tower but sees no planeScimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Stood directly under the tower but sees no planeScimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Stood directly under the tower but sees no planeScimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Stood directly under the tower but sees no planeScimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Stood directly under the tower but sees no planeaccidentsinspace won't be able to get back to you on that ND. He's now got a 3 day suspension.
Re: Stood directly under the tower but sees no planeand whilst he is kicking his heals - maybe he can remember where he wrote about 9/11 - another one who will never answer direct questions
Re: Stood directly under the tower but sees no planeI consolidated all of his 911 "fakery" topics as well, so you might want to look around a bit.
Re: Stood directly under the tower but sees no planeScimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Re: Stood directly under the tower but sees no planeThe claim of a clipping plane being used refers to a technology known as augmented reality. This is similar to, but distinct from a virtual environment. In augmented reality a virtual image is superimposed over an actual image to provide an augment image. The claim in this case is that an augmented reality was set up to augment actual video with virtual images of planes crashing into buildings.
Augmented reality systems require that the observer's view is well known. This means that the position of the observer and the direction the observer is viewing are well known. This means that the 6 degrees of freedom of the observer are well known. The x, y, z coordinates of the observer are not sufficient. That's half the game. The pitch, yaw, and roll also have to be known. These latter 3 must be known quite precisely, say 3 to 4 digits of precision at a minimum. The problem is that none of the videos could have been faked unless the cameras were outfitted beforehand with devices providing real time 6 degree of freedom feedback. Actually, 6 degrees of freedom is a minimum requirement. Getting back to the clipping plane issue, it would be impossible to implement any of the real time augmented reality features such as a clipping plane unless every camera were a part of the conspiracy. Please provide any evidence whatsoever that every camera that day contained devices providing real time coordinate feedback. Scimitars were not available - beware January 19, 2038 is upon us.
Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests |
|