New Film! 9/11 Revisited: "Explosive" Evidence

[Scepcop]

[Scepcop]

BTW, here's the trailer that shows how "explosive" this new film is!

[Nostradamus]

Oh brother! Another pseudoskeptic movie claiming explosives.

A lot of confused people in the "fog of war", as has been stated in another thread, running around thinking an explosiion must have occurred because the building collapses is not evidence.

1. Evidence is finding the tell tale marks of explosives on steel.
2. Evidence is finding the remains of explosives in the rubble pile.
3. Evidence is determining the opportunity to place the explosives.
4. Evidence is the noise of explosions.

Big failure on all counts by the pseudoskeptics that introduce these ridiculous videos. I have not seen the video, but the trailer is all of the rehashed nonsense seen on other sites.

1. Showing cuts on steel made by the clean up crews and claiming it happened in the collapse - shameful.
2. Showing chips of red paint and claiming it is thermite, thermate, nano-thermite, or whatever - shameful.
3. Being unable to account how hundreds of strangers placed hundreds of tons of explosives in the buildings without the occupants noticing - shameful.
4. Pretending that the videos of 9/11 show the sounds of CD explosions - beyond shameful.

Here is watch a CD sounds likes - it's loud!

I purposely picked a video on the first page of a search in YouTube that was not from 9/11. I chose the second video because it appeared to be further from the camera. The sound was not good on the first video.

The big problem is the noise of explosives. It's almost comical where the trailer has a person stating that the sound was like a string of small firecrackers going off.


Here is another video. Listen to how sharp the reports are from the CD explosions. This is not heard in any of the 9/11 videos.

I encourage everyone to scour the net for all sorts of CD video clips and see that any video with sound has these distinct, loud, and noticeable explosions. Then listen again to the trailer where people suggest there was one explosion or might have been an explosion and wonder what these film makers are thinking.

[ProfWag]

[ProfWag]

[Scepcop]

[Scepcop]

Nostradamus,
I found the clip I'm looking for. Here it is. In the beginning you can hear a HUGE echoing explosion. Definitely not caused by fire. (unless you want to delude yourself that it's from fire). Turn up your speakers for this one

[Scepcop]

[ProfWag]

Just curious Scepcop, just what WOULD you expect to hear when a 110 story building falls? Crickets?

[Scepcop]

[ProfWag]

[Scepcop]

Strong arguments about what? You have not demonstrated that the HUGE explosions and LOUD BLASTS came from concrete dropping. People said they were from bombs or devices that day.

You have not proven otherwise.

All you do is give conjecture and denial.

Are you referring to the military base thing? I told you, it was "allegedly". We do not know if that film was shown on military bases or not. Ask the producer of the film about it. Sheesh. I never said it was a proven fact that it was shown in military bases. I already told you that.

You are nitpicking at irrelevant things again, which is a sign of desperation, cause the truth isn't on your side.

[Nostradamus]

[Nostradamus]

[Nostradamus]