Moon Hoax Debate - The Radiation Issue

[really?]

[Misha]

[SydneyPSIder]

[Arouet]

[SydneyPSIder]

[Arouet]

You could be right on that.

But what's your opinion on the fogging issue? Are you suggesting that every space photo that is not fogged is a fake? Whether from the moon photos or elsewhere?

[really?]

[SydneyPSIder]

[SydneyPSIder]

You don't seem to have come back with any views on the fogging issue, Arou.

[SydneyPSIder]

According to the Fox doco from all that time ago, there was a problem with the Apollo 16 mission -- the largest solar flare outbreak that had occurred up to that time in the 20th c. Except the astronauts were just fine at the end.

Radiation treatment starts at 35:50



What is your view on the strength of the solar flares during the Apollo 16 missions, Arou? What protections did the astronots have?


On another topic, the ill-fated Apollo 1 was only just ready for tests/trials by 1967, with a deadline of reaching the moon by 1969, a mere two years away. It was obvious Apollo 1 was nowhere near spaceworthy, nor was the entire mission control comms infrastructure up to puff. Gus Grissom was critical of progress, and died in an oxygen fire in Apollo 1.

Thomas Ronald Baron was a govt inspector who found the Apollo project was substandard and well behind schedule at about the same time, he died in a car crash at the time, and his report mysteriously disappeared and was never submitted. He spoke on camera before he died of having been harassed at home, but that the harassment had died down. (32:28)