What's on the table?

[Misha]

Hi Guys,

I thought I would start a thread which might show cases in history and present agendas that best exemplify how programs come about. Yes, we all know about PNAC as an example. However, are there any other cases which point to patterns or cognitive associations which entertains the possible groundwork for a political or geopolitical outcome?

Here is one example worth considering:

http://truththeory.com/2012/10/03/hilla ... inst-iran/

[NinjaPuppy]

[Misha]

Thanks for replying, NinjaPuppy. Am I clear that you do not believe that PNAC's stated agenda (goal) was not "to promote American global leadership" under the guise of military strength and moral clarity? Did we not get military strength and moral clarity with the trumped up WMD lies concerning Iraq?

Yes, I do not know why Hillary is laughing? However, is Hillary providing another pretext for war? Is this another program?

[NinjaPuppy]

[really?]

[Misha]

[ProfWag]

[Misha]

'George Orwell once wrote, "in times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." This is a fight against universal deceit....

This is still a nation where a citizen can get up every morning and shout at the top of his lungs that the President, Vice President, Secretary of Defense, and the Secretary of State are lying sons of bi****s, and survive to see the sun go down. I know. I do it most days. Don't take my word for it. Ask Valerie.'

--From former U.S. Ambassador Joe Wilson, Page 267 from the book - "Fair Game."

Now ask, Misha. "They're lying bottom feeding sons of bi****s who have expended our nation's youth and wealth on lies."

[really?]

[ProfWag]

[NinjaPuppy]

[NinjaPuppy]

[NinjaPuppy]

[Arouet]

Ninja, not sure you're reading that wiki quote correctly. It says to deliver a false-statement. A "lie by ommission" is not a statement.

(not that I don't think people in the government have never lied, just saying the lie by ommission doesn't fit the bill)

[NinjaPuppy]