I can do telepathy EASY! - NSA

[G. ADAM]

Dude, you totally misread that security forum, every post says you cannot reverse the MD5 hash.

30 digits will prevent a brute force / database approach.

I'm trying to work out my own protocol aswell, so a few more goes with MD5 won't hurt.

If you want to try another trial and go for 20:1 ODDS TOTAL BROKEN then select FOUR NEW WORDS and list them.

We can try your rules on Demo Trials 6 to 10.

Little bit of cooperation will go a long way.

[ProfWag]

Instead of all these encryptions and acronyms that I don't understand, couldn't I just e-mail a number between 1 and 5 to a few people and then you tell us what number it was?

[G. ADAM]

Scientific Method is pretty open, but refusing to replicate a positive result is ludicrous!

Our newest member replica

None of you believe in signs either?

[Arouet]

[G. ADAM]

Nope! Only basic words and phrases can be reverse MD5'd as pointed out 4 times now.

If you want to switch to WINZIP encryptions fair enough, but changing the protocol after a true positive is cheating.

[G. ADAM]

[Arouet]

[Arouet]

[G. ADAM]

For the last time, if you refuse to replicate a successful result then your scientific method is nothing I want to partake in.

This happens every time I pass a trial, skeptics lift the bar before a significant result is established.

If you don't want to continue with the demonstration and nobody else will then I'm out!

Thanks for being a 1 question sucker!

[G. ADAM]

Your "objections from the beginning about encryption" were actually "you didn't now anything about it".

MD5 is the most used encryption system world wide.

[Arouet]

[G. ADAM]

No. I've explained 5 times already that posting the encryption locks in the word to guess.

If you send me a naked page and line number it's liable to read ANY of your recent thoughts.

All those reverse MD5 sites are just databases of a few million text strings.

You would need over 1000000000000000000000000000000 records database file to crack our MD5s.

I agree 5:1 ODDS is nothing, but you backed on trying for 25:1 ODDS with another trial.

If you bail on the first sign of success you're truly a pseudo-skeptic.

[Arouet]

[G. ADAM]

If you can't use any encryption system at all it's really quite pathetic.

You can lookup www.automeasure.com/chance.html

and work out how many trials, pass rate will be set at 50%. Or search binomial calculator.

Try out your MD5 HASH on a few of the 'MD5 crackers!'.

None of them will get it.

[Arouet]