30 Sep 2010, 21:01
When I hear a lecture from an expert on a subject, it usually comes out pretty quickly whether they can back up what they have to say or not. It's possible, I guess, that Icke simply holds back in his lectures, and just deals with things on a cursory and superficial basis and leaves the meat for his books. I'll be surprised but I'll give his book a scan.
I've been trying to get out of you some reason for why Icke is worth the effort, and you seem to respond with: he is, trust me, but its too hard to explain. There are a lot of crackpots out there, and we all have limited time, no one can research everything. So far, based on your comments, and Icke's lectures, I suspect he has very little of his primary theories that would withstand rigourous analaysis. It's easy to cherry pick and connect dots and call it a pattern. But you can't ignore the evidence that doesn't support your point of view. Everything that I've seen from Icke suggests that so far. I'll leaf through his book.
01 Oct 2010, 17:10
David Icke - The Man, The Legend
So David Icke Is A Nutter?? What Icke Said in 1991, What One Of The World's Top Physicists Said in 2008
08 Oct 2010, 14:55
HELLO,
this is my virgin post to .
"newbie" i just interest in topic will
discuss in here