Prowag, you made me laugh then. You say that scientifically controlled
experiments are not conclusive proof and complain when the "believers"
say any experiment is conclusive proof, but here you readily accept and
then tell us that these videos where Geller is allegedly bending spoons
is conclusive proof?
This is the difference between you and the professional skeptics at SRI.
They did not accept Geller's metal bending as conclusive, even the ring
which required 150lb force to bend it. Even despite the controls they had
where there is mirro above and below him and a camera filming from from
every angle. They did not accept it as conclusive because visual analysis could not
determine how they were being bent. On the other hand, you don't require any
such controls to confirm the counter-conclusion. For you just a slight movement
of his fingers is enough for you to say positively he bent it lol
And you claim not to be a pseudoskeptic?
SCEPCOP Forum
Scientific Committee to Evaluate PseudoSkeptic Criticism of the Paranormal