I can do telepathy EASY! - NSA

[NinjaPuppy]

[Arouet]

[G. ADAM]

OK, had a few problems with the word tester at paranormaltest.com

I can't seem to get channels if the word is generated too far past. So I need a human assistant to 'conceal' the word. I could get a database of words, but may as well do it live with a human tester!

Basically you have to teleask 1 word per day between 12am GMT and say 9am GMT.

Since that was a sticking point before, I should check if you want me to spell out the protocol, it's just the same really, 4 days to channel and on day 5 post 4 options and I have 4 guesses, 1 at each word.

2 trials to check if it's above expected, so 10 days all up before we regroup!

[derrida]

common lets do it !!

[Arouet]

You want to take over as the tester derrida, and use me and Ninja as the controls?

[G. ADAM]

It's better if you do the teleasking Arouet.

James Randi has lowered the application bar so I don't need a media presence, but I still need a letter from an academic who has seen the claim work.

We only need to break 100:1 odds for a reference letter.

Here is the protocol I will be submitting (draft)

----after midnight GMT----

TESTER:
Word 1 clue is at page XXX line XX

ADAM:
Word 1 clue is ((YYYYY))

----after midnight GMT----

TESTER:
Word 2 clue is at page XXX line XX

ADAM:
Word 2 clue is ((YYYYY))

----after midnight GMT----

TESTER:
Word 3 clue is at page XXX line XX

ADAM:
Word 3 clue is ((YYYYY))

----after midnight GMT----

TESTER:
The 3 Word Options are
A/ CAT
B/ DOG
C/ FISH

ADAM:
My selections of the 3 words are
Word 1 = C/ FISH
Word 2 = A/ CAT
Word 3 = B/ DOG

------------------------

Short break, scoring, repeat a few times until hit rate is consistently 50%+.

[Arouet]

G. Adam: if you are serious about using this as a protocol for applying for the MDC under the new relaxed rules, may I seriously suggest that you drop this whole 1 trial per day thing. It's just begging to be shot down by the MDC. It's a protocol that will just take way too long to get any meaningful sample. The JREF will not be interested in testing you for half a year what they could do in an afternoon.

It just seems like self-handicapping. It almost guarantees a rejection by JREF and then you will complain again that they don't want to test you. You will never get ANYONE outside an internet community (where its not particularly onerous) to do any serious testing of you based on one trial per day. Especially one where with computers generating the words and channels, you could get many trials done in a very short period of time.

My advice: get rid of the whole GMT criteria. It kills your entire protocol from a practicality standpoint.

Also you've now gone to three words, what are the odds with this protocol?

[Arouet]

On re-reading it I'm not sure I understand the role that GMT plays here. Is it one trial per day? All you say is after midnight GMT but you don't have a corrosponding before midnight GMT. At what point on this circle does it stop being after midnight GMT, and what is to happen then? What is your proposed window for doing these trials? Much better to just eliminate it from the protocol entirely. If you want it in there, you've got to flesh it out more. How many trials can be done in a day?

[G. ADAM]

I've tried all the alternatives.

Assuming my accuracy is pretty good, the best is 3:1 odds per day, that's
1 day 3:1
2 days 9:1
3 days 27:1
4 days 81:1
5 days 243:1
6 days 729:1
7 days 2187:1
...
14 days 1,000,000:1

As long as the costs are born by the claimaint it only takes them 1 minute per day. I can pop in the US or Australian office should they want to monitor my participation.

--------

The only other option is we do 20 words in an hour when we're both online and one of YOU do the guesswork after, i.e someone does NOT view the channel thread but does a multi choice test on my behalf!

That's a bit problematic on it's own though.

anyway, I would rather do 1 batch of 3 words than discuss it to death before it gets off the ground. somehow I doubt you'll allow a single batch to proceed

[Arouet]

[G. ADAM]

[Arouet]

I'm not wasting my time this time until we know exactly what the protocol entails. How are you determining the odds here?

[G. ADAM]

I'm not. I only need a high score roughly in the 100:1 to 1000:1 range.

It's a requirement of the application to have an acedemic say the claim is worth testing, that's all.

The expected average result is 1/3 right per batch. That's all we need isn't it?

Anyway it just past midnight GMT so this is my last call, I can't be bothered designing a levitron synchoniser to see if a man walks on water.

Can you tell me the first word clue?

I've discussed 100 of your objections for 2 1/2 months! If you can't comprehend the issues of TESTING A CLAIM then I'm not going to waste my time either.

[G. ADAM]

AND NO! DOING IT RIGHT DOES NOT EQUAL DOING NOTHING OVER STUPID REQUIREMENTS TO WORK OUT A CONTRACT.

I'VE GOT A DICE IN MY HAND, MY CLAIM IS TO ROLL 6'S

DO YOU WANT TO SEE OR NOT?

IF YOU SAY YOU "SHOULD DO IT RIGHT!" I'M OUT!

EVEN RANDI OFFERED TO VIEW DEMONSTRATIONS BUT YOU ARE STILL STUCK IN

WE ONLY AGREE IF HE PASSES A CONTRACTUAL OFFER!

This is EXACTLY the B/S that's stalled research 10 years and has had me shafted for 10 years.

I'VE GOT A DICE IN MY HAND. MY CLAIM IS TO ROLL 6'S

IF YOU REFUSE TO OBSERVE THEN YOU ARE NOT DOING IT RIGHT.

[Arouet]