As I've said time and again, people that are "logic-minded" (I can't even call it "rational" these days) tend to see the issue from their own point of view and thus, it must be law --
this is why there are not real psychics, in this case. The real ones are afraid or whatever other conjecture one wishes to apply even though history/anthropology/religion are all rife with example upon example of the spiritual recluse -- the old sage/hermit that lives deep in the woods, swamp, on a mountain side in a cave, etc. There are literally thousands of such accounts past and present, representing a wide range of spiritual traditions including Christianity and those groups that live outside of society in silence. . . how do they serve the world? They really exist and the church sees them as a sect of value, but how many people commission a hand written copy of the Bible these days? That's what this particular fellowship once did but it's not exactly viable now days, is it?
Back in the 1970's there was a woman psychic (Edna McCauley -- see the 1980 film "Resurrection") that endured close to a decade's worth of study by Berkley and other colleges. There is video of this woman actually bending laser light with nothing other than thought and a hand (free of mirrors). There's documentation of her healing polio victims and others in front of a dozen medical doctors, university staff and more who saw her slowly take on the deformities and general illness of the patient who would likewise transform, muscles relaxing and deformities correcting themselves, etc. The psychic would require up to three days of quiet and meditation before she could return to her own natural shape and be "free" of these afflictions and then she'd go through it one more time with another person that seemed ready to accept the healing. . .
. . . there's a rub -- they must be willing to ACCEPT the healing.
Even in the bible you find Jesus imposing demands on those he heals when it comes to faith and their commitment to serve "the lord" as well as their fellows. In most traditions you must ask permission to do such work and the subject must be willing to accept the "blessing" because of the karmic ramifications that could follow-suit.
Back to that film/woman psychic; she is a real person though, if I recall correctly, Edna McCauley wasn't her real name in life because of what ends up happening with her. . .
. . . she runs away from it all!
The public demand on her, the constant testing and harassment by way of the scientific community as well as fundamentalists seeing her as an instrument of the devil, etc. nearly caused her to have a complete breakdown. She changed her name and as is seen in the movie, she moves out to the middle of nowhere U.S.A. to live a humble, quiet life; exactly the sort of thing I've mentioned here and in other threads and too, I believe I've pointed out before how most of the more gifted Reader-Healer types end up having to get outside of the big city chaos as they age because they are too sensitive to the thousands upon thousands of thoughts, emotions, and general negativity they're surrounded by. Similarly, especially in Native American/Shamanic sects, the village wise one is frequently taken away from the main village as they age because they cannot distinguish carnal reality from the "spirit realms" (for lack of a better term). It's not schizophrenia or similar conditions, it's simply something that happens to those that are super sensitive and spiritually focused as they age. It is something time records as a constant and anthropology has proven more than a few times.
Not everyone is driven to prove a point. The majority of those that fit this very small niche of the psychic world, would never see how proving such things would be "helpful" to society other than man trying to exploit it and profit from it in ways that are far more cruel and criminal than what most charlatans are guilty of. We've seen it time and again, scientific breakthroughs turned into mega million dollar schemes; medical treatments that are deliberately withheld from certain aspects of world culture -- you can get it here but not here -- the fact that the same meds I have to pay over $2k a month for here in the U.S. cost less than a third that much in Canada and most all of Europe.
Yet, it's the psychics that are seen as the crooks, the liars, the cheats, the one's that prey on the unfortunate and offer them nothing but hope. . . hope is a multi-billion dollar industry if you haven't noticed. The analytical community "borrowed" from the old wizards, witches and Gypsies a very large amount of their knowledge and understanding when it began formulating a faux-science dealing with human behavior which expanded into psychology, psychiatry, and a massive
pharmeculture surrounding it that not only exploits the patient when it comes to dependency & costs but likewise the tax payer & insurance industry because once again, they over charge America for the same drugs and now days, they over-prescribe -- I keep thinking "Soma" for some reason
You may think what I've said here is "ridiculous" but show me one discovery or breakthrough that hasn't been turned into a money generating device thanks to science & "rationalism" and then tell me the same thing won't happen should the genuine "power" attributed psychics was ever confirmed, understood and harnessed.
There's a reason why the old one's had so many secrets, why they were protected under penalty of death and why the Rationalists of the middle-ages -- the priests, missionaries of Christianity, gladly tortured said folks in order to get to said secrets, to gains said power not to mention, forcing conversion.
So why, given these facts, is science really wanting to crack the whole psychic thing? What's the fantasy held by all these obsessed naysayers when it comes to such things? How will this insight "help" humanity?
What's wrong with keeping things a person feels to be sacred, sacred and secret; a part of their life that is shared only with those one is lead to share them with? What about reclusiveness is so wrong and why does it disturb you so much? Why can't you believe that there are people in society that simply don't feel compelled to function as you or most of humankind functions?
There's an old saying about dealing with the beam in one's own eye first, before worrying too much about the splinter in someone else's eye. . . maybe the skeptic's cult needs to answer some of these questions and consider perspectives other than their own selfish, self-serving agenda and perpetual curiosity. . . why you need to take the toy apart rather than simply enjoying it for what it is?
As I've said before, SCREW THE CROOKS! Hang the actual predators, but leave the rest of them alone. They do serve a positive purpose in society and have, for thousands of years. They do no real harm so why harass them and persecute them?
That is, other than to just feel superior in some way