Randi's rules have a safe guard of never having to pay the money.
Something about ''if'' Science can work out the answer in the future to the paranormal feat.
There is a way to catch Randi out, and it involves challenging Randi to change the Rules... Of which I am doing. Science will be my toy to through away...
SCEPCOP Forum
Scientific Committee to Evaluate PseudoSkeptic Criticism of the Paranormal
Randi's Flim Flam RulesRe: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
great post don
is incredible the lenghts a believer would go to maintain his faith in fairy tales dance !  For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
Don - I'm not a lawyer but it sure does seem as if you may be on to something here. What I know about contractual agreements, you could write on the head of a pin but I know if you sign one, you had better make sure to read it and perhaps have someone with a law degree explain it to you first.
I'm yet to see a contract written up by the party of the first part that is in the best interest of the party of the second part. Since it clearly states that there will be no changes to this contract, then any negotiations of the terms by the party of the second part, will not be happening. 
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
nah
i meant don´s post is pretty much what believers do best Bash skeptics instead of proving their fairy tales beliefs nobody is forcing the ¨idiots¨ (as Don wisely calls them) to take the test is A MILLION DOLLARS for heaven´s sake! is their contest i would like to see first a GUY proving he has any type of supernatural abilities before he starts bashing the contest he couldnt win For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
Ciscop - It's nice to know that you find us all so amusing.
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
ooh!
i wasnt laughing wrong emoticon i meant to put this one just a smile :-p For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Randi's Flim Flam Rules
ah but come now NP - can you honestly say you don't find the skeptics amusing at times ??
Return to JREF / Randi Challenge Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests |
|
