Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?
51 posts
• Page 2 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Re: Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?you are right zod
For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?I'm always very skeptical of any situation where someone's notability hinges on their connection to another notable person
Re: Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?and do you think dave koenig has any followers?
i havent bump into anyone seems only think he gets is rejection For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?So you guys like to kiss randi's tail at the end daily all in a row like he is your boyfriend and your guilt is dripping in atheistic anticipation of the inevitable reward that the Master will give to the minions of the JREF.....
Guess it isn't the Kool Aid that you are drinking up by the gallons is it? Seamer ... Are you really one of these guys? THE MAN THE SKEPTICS REFUSED TO TEST FOR A MILLION DOLLARS
Re: Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?yep seems the professor drank the kool aid
(with gallons of crystal skull vodka) koenig who are you going to talk about when randi dies? and what was your paranormal claim?? For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?yep
i also pointed out that Shermer failed on his debunk of vedic astrology on this forum (go to astrology) when they lose, they lose ![]() For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?To ciscop.
If one person can perform a notable paranormal ability , would you accept it without Scientific Recognition?. The reason I ask you in this manner is because you are not a Scientist. And seeing that you are not a Scientist, then how can you accept what Scientist's agree on , when you are not ''qualified'' to accetane if the Scientists got it correct or incorrect. SURELY ONLY A SCIENTIST KNOWS WHAT A SCIENTIST IS TALKING ABOUT, eh ? Randi has said that Scientists keep testing and retesting to see if what is established is true or not. So how can anyone ''PASS '' the preliminary test if the Scientists hold the right to keep testing and retesting a claimants ability or abilities. If the Scientists come across someone who can perform amazing feats, then how can Scientists say that it;s paranormal , if the Scientists can not give a '' Causation Explanation '' ?. Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?highflyer i think is time for you to erase what you just wrote
it is really really bad. ![]() For every person who reads this valuable book there are hundreds of naïve souls who would prefer to have their spines tingled by a sensational but worthless potboiler by some hack journalist of the paranormal. You who now read these sentences join a small but wiser minority. Martin Gaardner (Psychology of the Psychic)
Re: Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?So you ciscop aren't a Scientist ? So how do you know what ''is and isn't''.
Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?Let me help you ciscop. Awareness of the paranormal is how I and many other people know.
Have you ''ciscop'' ever been approached by a paranormal experience ? It doesn't make you wrong if you haven't had a paranormal encounter. Randi was no researcher of the paranormal even though he tried half heartedly.... Shows over.
Re: Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?How is randi doing anyway ... Say's he won't be attending anything that we said we'd be meeting him at ... Why is that?
THE MAN THE SKEPTICS REFUSED TO TEST FOR A MILLION DOLLARS
Re: Will u skeptics admit Randi was wrong to lie re: Sheldrake?Yes but he likes to use peoples hard times as a way of trying to make himself more popular.
51 posts
• Page 2 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Return to JREF / Randi Challenge Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|