SCEPCOP Forum

Well, Vinstonas, if you're going to set some collegiality rules for these forums, now would be a good time......

Interestin gis it not members of this forum,that the Professor has all this "inormation" about alledged offences by Randi ,yet doesn't present it to the authoritues.
It was only a few months ago he claimed to have reported me for internet stalking him(I know he should be so lucky)and his alledged boyfiend Jim Callahan(so sources tell me) reported Randi to the "FBI" for "counterfeiting". Note neither of these things came to anything. I've begged Prof to hurry the cops along in my case-to no avail.

All mouth and no action.This being his third forum attempt to discredit Randi,why does he think he will succeed where no one else has(Randi has enough "enemies")?

Another fact(from my sources)he was consider a danger to his own daughter so she was taken in to state care.Claiming voices from the dead worried the authorities so much they acted swiftly.True.

The Prof has an attention seeking disorders.His only success in life.

My daughter, my niece and I will be riding roller coasters at Universal Studio's tomorrow if anyone is interested in seeing exactly why Azreal was kicked off the Magic Cafe (His Lying and multiple Troll personalities) We were at Disney the other day. My daughter is fine despite his threats.

It's fantastic to see the amazing interest in the Blackmail Tapes.

Hope we can discuss them more fully once the Trolls have gone.

In the meantime ... SHARE THE THRUTH
http://www.uploadpedia.com/3015K1KO9LHD ... i-zip.html

The Troll (Probably all the same guy) is attempting to derail this thread that exposes the Truth. That's Obvious.
But Why?

I'd like to thank everyone who is giving this evidence an honest listen! That's all I ask.
http://www.uploadpedia.com/3015K1KO9LHD ... i-zip.html

The Professor: Stop making unfounded claims and calling people who disagree with you Trolls, Liars, and as having Multiple-Accounts unless you can back it up with evidence.

Skeprogue & Others: Stop resorting to personal attacks.

There are two sides to this story, and both are resorting to personal attacks. We seem to be at a standstill here. It's just flaming back and forth over these tapes. Knock it off.

Locking this thread might be a good idea if this continues.

All he has to do is post his proof, he wins skeptics lose game over. I for one will not be answering any more of his insane rantings unless he addresses this.

The few skeptics that have joined here,did so to re-address his lies not to have a flame war. Yourself now sees the person he is.

He can post his silly link over and over. Im sure after 40 years Randi has heard plenty accusations and slanderings on that topic an many others.It's no skin off his nose. Randi never replies to any criticism.This annoys Professor sooo much.

I have not attacked "The Professor" personally here, and I don't intend to start now. It's my opinion that his own posts are far more damaging to his credibility than anything I can say about him.

The JREFers here on this thread have come to derail it! It is their MO for anything that shows the Truth about randi ....especially these PedoFiles.

They follow me around like little puppies

I simply bring the Thread back on track for all to see.

Attacking me is just their way of distracting from the Truth.

Just look at the first post and you'll see that what I say is the truth.

So, "Professor," when are we going to see you do something productive toward protecting these children you claim to be concerned about (but obviously do not, since you have been spamming this smear to Internet forums for years without actually reporting your "evidence" to the appropriate authorities?)

When will we hear your explanation as to how you know the fable you posted represents "verbatim" what was said in court?

I'm Just After The Truth....

Hi All,

I've posted a file (jamesrandifiles.zip) at: http://www.mediafire.com/?sa1x24bxgo9

It contains most of the material from my 'Randi's critics' folder, gathered during the time I've been compiling the Uri Geller bibliography (http://www.zem.demon.co.uk). Much of the material in it might be old news to some here but hopefully others will find it of use. Please note that I am not on an anti-Randi bandwagon (anymore than I'm on a pro-Geller one) and that the material in the files deals with more than just the 'blackmail tapes'. (Sorry but I couldn't be bothered to sort through it to extract the relevant bits).