Discuss PseudoSkeptics and their Fallacies. Share strategies for debating them.
29 Jul 2014, 02:18
Enrisdynsamough,
You are right. Pseudoskeptics lie, obfuscate and deny when it comes to conspiracy evidence. Here are some obvious examples:
They claim:
That in the JFK assassination, there is no evidence that Ruby and Oswald knew each before the assassination.
In reality:
A dozen witnesses claim to have seen them both together. These are not anonymous witnesses. They are named, documented and recorded on video. Anyone can confirm this if they want.
They claim:
There are no whistleblowers in the JFK assassination.
In reality:
There are nearly 20 whistleblowers from insiders, some of whom are high ranking government officials, such as Fletcher Prouty and E. Howard Hunt. This is well documented, taped, and recorded.
They claim:
The headshot that hit JFK's head and caused it to move back and to the left doesn't say anything about where it came from, because the movement of the head says nothing about where the shot came fromm.
In reality:
Any experienced rifleman or military soldier will tell you that's not true. If you hit an object or a head, it moves away from where the bullet came from. This is common sense and a basic law of physics. Real life riflemen who have shot heads can verify this too. Even children know this. It's common sense. These conspiracy debunkers are trying to obfuscate and confuse you so you won't listen to basic logic and common sense. It's really stupid.
So you see, this isn't honest debate. These people are flat out lying in many cases.
09 Feb 2015, 20:23
Post your folded it. There are a lot of people who want to get information, but to guarantee it.