Discuss PseudoSkeptics and their Fallacies. Share strategies for debating them.
22 Feb 2013, 12:51
Yeah, he's entertaining for a bit - problem with this kind of troll is that they have a limited playlist. I'd admire it if they could keep it going, but this guy is clearly out of material.
23 Feb 2013, 22:13
I've only glanced through these posts, but am I understanding that I am being stereotyped as belonging to a certain organized group simply because I tend not to believe in mind reading or ghosts?
08 Jan 2014, 08:42
Justintime,
You are grouping all skeptics with the likes of Michael Shermer and his friends. Scientific skepticism is divergent from classical skeptical thought and will last forever in one form or another. Shermer and the like would like us to believe scientific skepticism is the new and improved version of classical skepticism but there are some serious flaws in the way scientific skepticism uses a basis in the scientific method instead of a basis in a logical method as previous skeptics did.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.