New Theory Explains How Objective Reality Emerges
Posted: 10 Nov 2012, 12:14That is conundrum. The reason that I logged on to this site to begin with was because of an earlier posted Article about debunking the Law of Attraction. As far as I could see the Article was all based on non-empirical evidence and not scientific at all. This Quantum thing that basically implies "you see what you expect to see" is the scientific side of that same coin. So all the Article BS about "belief" and "faith" as proof that it does not work, is not proof at all. What is "genuine" belief, as opposed to pretend or false belief, and how do you know that you have it? What is "genuine" faith, and how do you know when you have it?
As to the seeming opposition between the microscopic and the macroscopic, there will have to be some other branches of science blended together to eventually give the whole picture. But in the meantime I offer this theoretical explanation: If you consider the whole Universe to be some form of conscious mechanism, (in totality) and we are just separate individuated units of consciousness that separated from that totality. There are some pieces of scientific evidence that would support that theory. (how thoughts effect plants, and water freezing patterns etc.) That in spite of the experience of separateness there is a consciousness connection at some different level.
Our individual consciousnesses are very limited when compared to the whole (after all ours appears to have sprung out of the whole) and there is no reason to believe that there are not other beings who inhabit the Universe who are 100 or a 1000 times more conscious than us. So our consciousness "expectations" may effect the microscopic universe, but the moon probably does revolve around the earth because "something" is conscious of it all the time. (and it is probably not us)