Paul McCartney was replaced by a double in 1966, experts say

[Scepcop]

I heard that recently two Italian forensic experts announced in Wired magazine that based on photo and voice analysis, there is a high probability that the Paul McCartney before 1966 and after are different people, meaning that he was replaced by a double. Here is an article about it in English.

http://plasticmacca.blogspot.com/2010/0 ... l-was.html

Here is a voice comparison between Paul and Faul's (the imposter) songs. It shows a different imprint in the voice harmonics from computer analysis. You can listen to the clips yourself here.

http://plasticmacca.blogspot.com/2009/1 ... rints.html

In the David Icke forum, there is a huge mega thread about this topic.

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=102300

What do you think? Is it possible the world was duped?

I also heard that several of McCartney's ex girlfriends before 1966 claim that the Paul after 1966 is not the same man they dated.

Wow. Fascinating.

[ProfWag]

Don't forget that because Paul isn't wearing any shoes on the cover of the Abbey Road album, that confirms your story as that symbolizes a dead person in a coffin who also don't wear shoes.
Oh, and don't forget about the music group Klaatu! Wow, very spooky. Really. It is.
http://www.klaatu.org/klaatu1.html

[NinjaPuppy]

I remember all the hubbub about if you play some song on one of the albums, you can hear, "Paul is dead! Paul is dead! Don't forget it's about the same time Paul's chipped tooth suddenly got fixed. I am the walrus....goo goo g'joob.

[Scepcop]

[Scepcop]

Check out this voice harmonics comparison between Paul saying "Hey" before and after 1966.



Also, listen to this short chilling interview with Heather Mills, Paul's ex wife. She claims that she knows a secret about Paul so devastating that it would endanger her life and that people would not be able to handle it. What could she be referring to?

[Scepcop]

Check out these side by side comparison photos of an interview with Paul McCartney in 1966 vs. 1967.

Notice every aspect of the face. Look closely. Don't they look like obviously different people?

[ProfWag]

[mr. mike]

I've heard these theories, and unlike the faked Moon landing or the two Oswalds I don't see who would gain from trying to fake Paul McCartney. Bands have had members die and continued to play (The Who, for example) or slowly disintigrated (from 1968 to 1970, The Monkees* went from four members to two, then stopped recording until the late 1980s.) George Martin had to find a guy who looked very much like PM, could play a guitar, and had a similar voice or could fake it for long periods of time. The odds are against all of it. With the two Lee Harvey Oswalds you have a far more serious reason for this doppelganger to exist, alleged records, a possible source for the fake, etc.; I've never heard of any relatives of a Paul McCartney look-alike calling the police or talking to the press because the guy went missing. And, yes, Scepcop I did look at the "Plastic Macca" blog and I wasn't impressed.

____________________________________________________________________
* Yes I know they were a pre-fab band, but the intersting thing was they carried on after their show was cancelled and their label support shriveled up.

No, I don't believe in the Two Oswalds theory either.

[NinjaPuppy]

[ProfWag]

[mr. mike]

That was my point exactly....I had a long reply but the site dropped me. Anyway, who is the fake Paul? If the real Paul McCartney is dead, where is he buried? If not, where are they keeping him? Were the relatives and friend of PM paid to keep silent, or were they threatened to keep their silence? Was it the same for the fake Paul? I don't remember reading of a long period in 1966 when Paul was out of the limelight. Who trained the fake Paul to act, play the guitar, and sing like PM? You can see, NinjaPuppy how the whole thing unravels if you ask enough questions. For this fraud to have carried on you would have a large number of people involved.....somebody has to talk sometime and not obliquely like in that hacked up youTube clip.

[NinjaPuppy]

[mr. mike]

I woulden't call them growing pains, it was more like a death rattle....the Beatles broke up in 1970; but yes I agree with the hype, and it kept growing throughout the 1970s as people hoped the band would get back together (even the producer of Saturday Night Live, Lorne Michaels, begged the ex-members to reform and play on his stage.) Beatlemania was no substitute. I can see where these theories take root; the band changed a lot between 1964 and 1968, with the key period of change being 1966-67. Why not have some sort of hidden incident being the catalyst for that change?

[NinjaPuppy]

[ProfWag]

Since most of us love a good conspiracy or mystery, how about this one: The Beatles didn't break up until the '80s. They just went underground and formed Klaatu. Here's a sampling of their music (note the lack of credits...)