Like I said in the other thread ...
Coast To Coast I don't particularly care for. They will invite anyone on who seems to have a good paranormal / fringe / weird story for radio, including MANY hoaxers and non-credible personalities in these fields who have appeared throughout Coast To Coast's history.
George's format is basically to ask very soft comfortable questions, never be judgemental, and go "Gee golly whizz!" at everything the guest says. Coast To Coast is pure fluff.
I MUCH prefer the format of The Paracast. They always ask hard questions, and drill the guest like crazy with very valid skeptical questions. They bring on very credible people for serious indepth interviews and get deep in discussing the research. And they bring on hoaxers and non-credible personalities in these fields frequently, but with the intent of EXPOSING THEM. (They basically ask very logical questions of the guest, point out whatever reeks, and give them a rope to hang themselves, basically.) They have no tolerance for fluff, only for serious inquiry.
http://www.theparacast.com/That's the type of format I want.
A close second is Alex Tsakiris' Skeptiko, where he interviews both Paranormal Researchers AND Skeptics (Like Randi, Shermer, Wiseman, Etc) in order to get an even-handed approach on his Podcast.
http://www.skeptiko.com/
"I think Eteponge's Blog is a pretty cool guy. eh debates Skeptics and doesnt afraid of anything."