Discuss General Topics.
02 Oct 2009, 00:49
I believe I've found the source of this "34%" reference: Utts, Jessica, AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EVIDENCE FOR PSYCHIC FUNCTIONING, 1995. It's a meta-analysis, so I'll have to search the underlying experiments' protocols in order to ascertain whether or not they employed multiple raters.
02 Oct 2009, 10:45
So we begin with an out of context statement about one or more studies and we end up with circling the wagons.
The 3 lines of defense are simply unimportant. The issue is being able to defend a position. Those who have not been to a scientific meeting have no idea what it means to defend a claim. Are you pretending that the tough questions are reserved for the psi believers? Then you would be mistaken.