Page 2 of 5
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
15 Nov 2009, 22:03
by NinjaPuppy
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
15 Nov 2009, 22:06
by NinjaPuppy
I am sure that you can probably quote these definitions better than Wikipedia but for those who are reading along at home (lurkers) I wanted to make sure that we had the actual descriptions and definitions spelled out.
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
16 Nov 2009, 08:19
by Nostradamus
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
16 Nov 2009, 19:26
by ProfWag
Oh my goodness. A simple statement typed in response to my anger about this whole 9/11 thing is starting to take on a different course than I had intended. Bottom line for me to clarify, I believe that virtually every post Sceopcop has presented as evidence of a conspiracy on 9/11 was not fact-checked prior to posting. I believe that his sources are not valid and many of the people that he uses as a source of information are not experts and probably have an agenda or reason for spreading misinformation. That's really all I meant my my previous post. It's one thing to question something, which I encourage, but once the answer is shown, then one should move on to something else rather than twist and turn it to fit a belief.
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
16 Nov 2009, 21:20
by NinjaPuppy
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
16 Nov 2009, 22:09
by Nostradamus
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
16 Nov 2009, 22:47
by ProfWag
No offense taken Ninja. How could I get upset with you?
It's these other posts that people may stumble upon and with just one side of a topic shown, wouldn't be aware of the rest of the story. On a topic like 9/11, it's vitally important that people look at all sides of a story, and not just a youtube video from a potentially unreliable source, and make up their own minds to answer any questions they may have.
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
18 Nov 2009, 02:39
by ciscop
so is there´s gonna be a time limit for this?
i wonder how scescop plans to battle shermer (or anyone) at dragoncon
is his plan just to say a lot of random $%·"· and quote his own antiskepticism manifesto?
thats gonna be uglier than the Texas chainsaw massacre...
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
18 Nov 2009, 02:52
by ProfWag
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
18 Nov 2009, 06:13
by NinjaPuppy
Not to derail this topic but I recently heard an interview with Shermer on 'Ghost Divas' and that man is really good on his feet. I was going to post a link but the first 20+ minutes of this show has nothing to do with Shermer and I never got to listen all the way through, so it wasn't fully tested for accuracy.

Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
19 Nov 2009, 05:33
by ProfWag
Since Scepcop's back in this thread again (but who knows for how long), I thought I should bump this up in case he missed it. Still waiting and we're on day 10 for him to counter my claim that he posts false and misleading information.
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
19 Nov 2009, 05:56
by ciscop
scescop???? scescooooop???
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
19 Nov 2009, 19:38
by ProfWag
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
23 Nov 2009, 06:39
by Nostradamus
ciscop you constantly crack me up. thanks
Re: A Challenge to Scepcop

Posted:
24 Nov 2009, 06:09
by ciscop