A Challenge to Scepcop

[ProfWag]

[ciscop]

a friend of a friend that has no reason for lying and is a charming sweet person counts as reliable source?

[ProfWag]

[ProfWag]

It is now a day after I posted this challenge. Scepcop has made 10 other posts, but has not responded to neither this challenge nor my comments pertaining to the promotions of the Generals which he alluded to not being able to be debunked.
Scepcop, if you can't properly find the source for the information you have posted, please let us know so we can move on to other things. I'm going to hate to do a "Scepcop Challenge Watch" every day. But I will until you respond. I'm fed up with you making posts without having any evidence to support your statements. Your Rumsfeld and Chaney comment should have a solid source that can easily be found and posted if it exists. If not, then that is my conclusion that your conspiracy theories are based on lies and misinformation. Additionally, and this is a warning to you, every 9/11 conspiracy post you make from now on will have a reply from me regarding this challenge until it gets answered by you.
ProfWag

[ciscop]

i predict if anything
scescop will bark and acuse
but he will not produce the source your are looking for
since he doesnt need it
thats the beauty of believers, they got nothing but faith ¨in something¨

[ProfWag]

Well, Day 2 of the Challenge and nothing so far. I'm holding out hope for him though!

[ProfWag]

Day 3 with still no comment on my Rumsfield/Chaney challenge or the "debunking the General's promotion" sources showing that Scepcop's sources aren't valid. Hmmm, I'm beginning to think my theory about him posting information that he didn't even begin to bother to look into is correct. But hey, it's only been 72 hours...
Fingers cross!

[ciscop]

bumping this back to the top....

[ProfWag]

[NinjaPuppy]

I think that SCEPCOP has been doing the 'View Your Posts' thing and may not be seeing any topics that he has not recently posted to. Just a guess.

I also don't know what to say when skeptics want to 'ban' themselves. That's new to me.

[ProfWag]

[ciscop]

uuum.. we are gonna miss you wag
you were a light of rationality in this crazy yet funny forum

and
i think scescop defends himself saying he is spreading some "interesting info" he found
the problem is that he lacks the tools of critical thinking
so a lot of things just escapes him

[ProfWag]

[NinjaPuppy]

[ProfWag]