Re: Stood directly under the tower but sees no plane
Posted:
26 Oct 2009, 14:17
by brett
yes a very good summation nostradamus - have you noted that AIS has failed to answer my direct question :as to what he is - vis truther - skeptic - government disinfo agent etc ?? - or where he has supposedly written about 9/11 - so just WHAT is his agenda here ?? - i am beginning to wonder if there are some who just wish to disrupt this forum by endless posting of irrelevant you tube videos etc
Re: Stood directly under the tower but sees no plane
Posted:
26 Oct 2009, 21:00
by Nostradamus
Thanks Brett. AIS says little and makes grandiose unsubstantiated claims. My guess is that this was a cover for someone who is making an attempt to flex a little muscle and is quickly learning that many people out there actually have done quite a bit of investigation into various subjects.
I hope that during the 3 day R and R for AIS he begins to realize that these are very complicated issues and that simply posting videos with no substantiating evidence or discussion is pointless. I'm expecting to hear something like my iPhone has a program (whatever they are called on the iPhone) that does a compass and level so of course they could be installed on the cameras. What won't be understood is the required digits of precision or the latency. The latter is how quickly the position is reported back to the rendering system. In VE, virtual environments, latency results in 'swimming'. This is where the user sees a turbulent swirling mess that does not match the motions they are making. There is a disconnect between our vestibular, kinesthetic, and proprioceptive senses and the visual feedback. In augmented reality there is a lack of registration between the real world and the augmented reality displays. Another big issue here is noise. Getting sensors to work in a controlled environment is tricky. Getting them to work in the real world is difficult.