Stood directly under the tower but sees no plane

[Nostradamus]

You continue to use language such as "shitty", which I think talks about your substance and the substance of your video.

[Nostradamus]

I have done quite a bit of image processing and understand the underlying mathematics. So when I see the nose out segment doing a so-called match up using a blurred image I also know that the image is missing ____.

If you want to defend the video and its improper analysis using video editing please fill in the blank.

[accidentsinspace]

[Scepcop]

ProfWag,
So how do you explain the plane's nose coming out the other side?

How many witnesses were near WTC that day and said they saw no plane?

The September Clues film is confusing. Eventually it gets into too many lines and angles and loses me there as to what the point is or where the discrepancy is.

[ProfWag]

[ProfWag]

[accidentsinspace]

[brett]

oh for heavens sakes man - we all saw the planes hit the towers - ( we did not see the one hit the pentagon although something did - nor the mysterious flight that was supposed to have crashed else where ) - as to WHO was on those planes - or controlling them is open to dispute - but any insistence that planes did not hit the towers is ludacris -( and yes i have read the wacko scenario that they where cruise missiles projecting holographic images of planes + a few other nut job stories ) - simple fact born out by witnesses such as fire fighters ( whom i would tend to believe over official .unofficial, conspiracy, cover up , black op , false flag, Micky mouse , the wizard of oz , and the 3 little pigs , stories )

got to go with prof wag on this one

if you can PROVE there where no planes - then do so - either put up or SHUT UP !! - its hard enough discussing this issue without going in to the realms of fantasy - there is enough fiction about what REALLY happened that day already

[accidentsinspace]

[Nostradamus]

AccidentsInSpace is clearly either a troll or a poorly educated teenager. I go with the teenager guess.

The foul language, poor writing skills, and inability to present evidence are all indicative of his age.

I still challenge accident to a discussion on image processing issues. I see that he has failed to rise to the challenge.

[accidentsinspace]

[Nostradamus]

Find out. Post any of your claims and you'll find out what a dolt of a claim it is.

[NinjaPuppy]

[Nostradamus]

Until accidents posts anything to support his no-planer delusion I will put him on ignore.

[brett]

and people who cant argue a point resort to personal insults - well carry on calling me names - you are just showing yourself up for what you are and do you SERIOUSLY think you are upsetting me ?? - i have been insulted by EXPERTS

nice summation there nostradamus BTW