SCEPCOP Forum

Decide for yourself

First, Richard Gage is an architect. Not a structural engineer. According to his December 2007 newsletter:
"Tell your friends, family and colleagues the truth that you know — particularly the structural engineers!" (bolding by Richard Gage himself). Sounds like a desparate plea for their support.

"There indeed is a shortage of actual structural engineers who claim WTC was demolished with explosives. This page lists well over 1000 certified structural engineers, certified by the Structural Engineering Certification Board (SECB) of The National Council of Structural Engineers Association. And that is just certified structural engineers in United States, Puerto Rico & Virgin Islands, certified in 2005 or later. Consider, how many thousands of more of structural engineers there are worldwide. And how many of these over 1000 certified structural engineers question the events of 9/11? You guessed it, not a single one." http://911guide.googlepages.com/ae911truth
"Architects and Engineers are trained to design buildings that function well and withstand potentially destructive forces. However, the 3 high-rise buildings at the World Trade Center which ‘collapsed’ on 9/11 (the Twin Towers plus WTC Building #7) presented us with a body of evidence (i.e.controlled demolition) that was clearly outside the scope of our training and experience." - Richard Gage
Richard Gage himself admits, that controlled demolition is clearly outside the scope of his expertise. Yet, all his evidence consists of arguments trying to prove the demolition of the 3 towers.
http://911guide.googlepages.com/ae911truth

Next, I present something interesting. I wanted to see how many of the people on his petition are current architects or engineers and not simply a student, wife, or cartoon character. Unfortunately, it appears that I cannot have access to this information without SIGNING THE PETITION! What the HELL?
"Note: We will display Architects and Engineers on our supporters list after we contact you and verify your information. "Others" will be accepted after review of your information."

Does anyone need further information to help you decide if he is fradulent or not?

I don't believe I said he lied. I'm asking if others believe he is fraudulent. I believe he is and I have quite a bit of evidence to support my theory that he is a fraud.
Oh, and thanks for that list. I wonder why I couldn't access if from his site? Did you sign the petition Mr. Wu?

BTW, this site you linked: http://911guide.googlepages.com/ae911truth

is very LOW, DIRTY, SCUMMY and full of nothing but ad hominem attacks. If that is your style of argument, then I have no respect for you, frankly speaking. Nothing of substance seems to be what you're posting.

Furthermore, you insinuating that Mr. Gage is a fraud with no proof, as a desperate attempt to discredit him is libelous and slanderous, which is a misdemeanor!

Shame on you.

Have you seen the film 9/11 Blueprint for Truth yet? If not, why are you discussing this? You didn't do your homework first. Maybe you are afraid of the truth?

Please stop BSing and look at the REAL evidence.