Definitive Proof we went to the Moon!

[ProfWag]

[SydneyPSIder]

he'd be shut down. but not to say he won't attempt it in the future, or hasn't attempted it in the past. and everything is a 'document', btw.

now, back to the concentration of inferred polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in deep space?

[Misha]

[ProfWag]

[Misha]

[ProfWag]

[Misha]

Sigh. Now this is why I would like you to read LaFramboise's book. Follow the money. It is the money that keeps people employed. No brainer.

[SydneyPSIder]

[ProfWag]

[SydneyPSIder]

Last edited by SydneyPSIder on 16 Jul 2014, 09:03, edited 1 time in total.

[SydneyPSIder]

Here's a very disturbing analysis pointing out a lot of the fakery in NASA's supposed 'moon shots' and videos -- lots of inconsistencies and repeated backdrops from all angles, etc etc -- written in very colloquial language. When an analysis can be done this simply, it makes the NASA photographic forgers look like complete amateurs -- no consistency in shots, re-use of foregrounds and backgrounds in different shots, etc. It seems once they fabricated a football field sized foreground simulacrum of the moon's surface with a few craters dug in the sand they used, etc, they had to keep re-using them over and over and mixed and matched them with the backdrop backgrounds. It's not clear whether the addition of backgrounds came later with photographic touch-ups, whether they used a backdrop screen with a projector as suggested by the Russian 3D stereoscopic analysis, or whether they used large sheets of plastic as a projection technique a la 2001: a space odyssey. Or perhaps a combination of all 3 as time progressed and the fakery got more sophisticated.

http://apolloscam.atspace.co.uk/

This is some linked footage I was looking for that I'd lost track of showing a camera traversing the fake moonscapes prepared at Langley Research Centre:

[Scepcop]

The laser reflectors left on the moon's surface, which are touted by Apollo believers are hard evidence of the Apollo Moon Landings, are not. First, lasers were already being bounced off the moon's surface before the Apollo landings were alleged to take place. The Dec 1966 issue of National Geographic reported that scientists at MIT were doing just that. In fact, radio waves were being bounced off the moon as early as the 1950's. Here is a screen shot of the article in that issue describing it: (for some reason, I am not able to embed it)

http://s9.postimage.org/a10sw4qd9/Natio ... _small.jpg

Second, laser reflectors were dropped on the moon by unmanned probes by both the US and Soviet Union. Here are two examples of Soviet unmanned probes leaving laser reflectors, as described by Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunokhod_1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunokhod_2

Thus this argument is not hard evidence for the authenticity of the Apollo Moon Landings. For more info about the laser reflectors, see Jarrah White's FAQ: http://moonfaker.com/faqs.html and his YouTube videos entitled “Moonfaker laser reflectors”.

[Emily]

[SydneyPSIder]

And what level is detectable by the human nose? And we know that the sense of human smell is not a particularly sensitive thing compared to many other species. Remember we now have a range of alleged space smells from metallic to BBQs to sugar! Some outside of the galaxy according to one article cited by prof! You obviously didn't read the wondrous musings of one enlightened space author quoted above who assures us that in deep space 'outside of the galaxy' there are clouds of sugar and sulphur -- despite the likelihood that in the absence of nearby decayed stars throwing out heavier elements as a fusion process there is even less likelihood of finding elements drifting in space -- and certainly nobody has been there to find out, and there is no spectrography possible at that distance with those concentrations.

Given the manned moon landings were a hoax, which account of 'space smells' are we supposed to believe? But sure, I can accept there's a few elements floating around out there made in the same process that made the planets. Although most of them are generally sucked in by gravity to a larger body, which is how the planets, moons, dwarf planets, asteroids and comets formed, using the essential property of all mass and matter which is possessing the 'property' of gravity.