SCEPCOP Forum

Too much crap to respond to all of it. But in reading that first article you posted, it did not say that people get fried to a crisp from these rays while in spaceships. The concern seems to be exposure to too much radiation which should be considered an unacceptable health risk. It takes far longer to get to Mars than the moon, the concern raised in this article is that the health risks would be unacceptable and more needs to be done to protect astronauts from that.

What you are doing, as you often do, is taking one point, bringing it to an extreme, and then using that extreme version to back up your point. It's a strawman, Scepcop.

Honestly, I don't know why you keep getting taken in by these youtubers, and bloggers who don't know how to write a headline with an exclamation mark. You need to take a step back and really see if they are using language that is designed to manipulate, such as appeals to emotion, rhetorical questions, false dichotomies, and any other logical fallacies.

Calling people that disagree with you names does not really help things either.

That is a tactic for the cynic or the pseudo-skeptic; not one that true skeptics would ever want to use.

Dark Side of the Moon is a French documentary by director William Karel which ...originally aired on Arte in 2002 with the title Opération Lune. The basic premise for the film is the theory that the television footage from the Apollo 11 Moon landing was faked and actually recorded in a studio by the CIA with help from director Stanley Kubrick. It features some surprising guest appearances, most notably by Donald Rumsfeld, Dr. Henry Kissinger, Alexander Haig, Buzz Aldrin and Stanley Kubrick's widow, Christiane Kubrick. The tone of the documentary begins with low key revelations of NASA working closely with Hollywood at the time of the Moon landings. Over the course of the tale, Karel postulates that not only did Kubrick help the USA fake the moon landings but that he was eventually killed by the CIA to cover up the truth. First hand testimony backing these claims come from Rumsfeld and Dr. Kissinger, which lend credence to the story.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 5368202642

Okay, if you think that 30,000 NASA employees can keep a secret, do you think that India and Japan would help cover it up as well? Both of these countries recently sent unmanned spacecraft around the moon and sent back photographs of the moon landings...

Sorry Winston, you're so far off base on this stupidity.

That doesn't answer my question.

How do you explain the Apollo 9 forgery above? It was clearly not shot from space. The globe is not really Earth. How do you guys explain that?

And what about the anomalies video above?

You guys have been whipped on this issue big time.

All you do is run from the issues.

Check out this FAQ about the Moon Hoax. It includes answers to questions about the moon rocks, laser reflectors, Soviets, etc.

http://www.moonmovie.com/faq.htm