Discuss Conspiracies and Cover Ups - e.g. 9/11 Truth, JFK Assassination, New World Order, Roswell, Moon Hoax, Secret Societies, etc. whatever conspiracy floats your boat.
by ProfWag » 20 Jul 2010, 02:51
-

ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by ProfWag » 20 Jul 2010, 02:58
-

ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by Chemist » 20 Jul 2010, 03:05
What puzzles me about the truthers position is that I had assumed that the general public knows how steel reacts in a fire. That's why we insulate it in buildings and other structures. Here's another recent example of what happens to steel in fire started by fuel and raging out of control. It's the I-580 bridge collapse. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp69PmhE ... L&index=11
-
Chemist
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 15 Jul 2010, 05:13
by Chemist » 20 Jul 2010, 03:09
-
Chemist
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 15 Jul 2010, 05:13
by stundie » 20 Jul 2010, 03:44
Last edited by stundie on 20 Jul 2010, 03:52, edited 1 time in total.
There is no such things as magic, just magicians and fools.
-

stundie
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: 09 Dec 2009, 08:17
by stundie » 20 Jul 2010, 03:46
There is no such things as magic, just magicians and fools.
-

stundie
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: 09 Dec 2009, 08:17
by stundie » 20 Jul 2010, 03:51
There is no such things as magic, just magicians and fools.
-

stundie
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: 09 Dec 2009, 08:17
by ProfWag » 20 Jul 2010, 03:52
-

ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by stundie » 20 Jul 2010, 03:55
There is no such things as magic, just magicians and fools.
-

stundie
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: 09 Dec 2009, 08:17
by stundie » 20 Jul 2010, 03:57
So any of you debunkers going to address the question I posed??
How does a building have no resistance from a fire/single column failure collapse??
I know you want to avoid addressing the issue by burying it with many other pointless points, but it's not going away and seeing as you support the official story, it should be easy for you to explain.......lol
p.s. Don't do that stupid debunker thing of claiming it as already been explained because it hasn't! lol
There is no such things as magic, just magicians and fools.
-

stundie
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: 09 Dec 2009, 08:17
by ProfWag » 20 Jul 2010, 04:00
-

ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by stundie » 20 Jul 2010, 04:04
There is no such things as magic, just magicians and fools.
-

stundie
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: 09 Dec 2009, 08:17
by ProfWag » 20 Jul 2010, 04:18
-

ProfWag
-
- Posts: 3847
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 03:54
by Chemist » 20 Jul 2010, 04:37
-
Chemist
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 15 Jul 2010, 05:13
by stundie » 20 Jul 2010, 04:38
I have always maintained that WTC 7 fell at near free fall speeds and it fell at free fall speeds for 2.25 seconds. This is what the videos show us and the conclusion of the NIST. This is was par of the premise of my 1st post here to Scecop.
What you have done is rather than agreeing that this has always been my position, what you are doing is changing the tactic by suggesting that I am misleading by saying that because it fell at free fall for 2.25 seconds, then I am therefore claiming the entire building fell at free fall when I have never once suggested this to avoid answer MY QUESTION which you keep skirting around with pointless rants.
If you believe I think that the WTC 7 fell at free fall then it is you that is misled and are arguing with yourself. lol
Now when are you going address the issue of the 2.25 second of free fall against the theory that is not yours, but you appear to support very strongly to the point you objected and hilariously denied that there was any free fall because it was 40% slower according to you, until the flaw was pointed out to you of coursr with no reconciliation of that fact? lol
There is no such things as magic, just magicians and fools.
-

stundie
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: 09 Dec 2009, 08:17
Return to Conspiracies / Cover Ups
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests
|
|