Danish Scientist comments on Thermite in WTC Dust

[Scepcop]

Danish Scientist Neils Harrit interviewed by Russia Today about the controlled demolition of the WTC with nano-thermite.

Parts 1 and 2 below.

[Nostradamus]

Again, not much here but an interview in English with Harrit.

Summary:
Calls the material he tested "remains of thermitic material", but says he has no idea what variety.

Makes claims of 100 tons of conventional explosives.
Why? Because he knows that thermite could not bring the building down.

Notes that the material he found matches the paint applied to the steel. Pulls a strawman argument about NIST tests with high temperature fires and the paint.

Points out that no one care about this paper except for some on the internet. Says his paper has brought on "... roaring silence .."

Little content in this video. Imagine that.

[Scepcop]

Say what?

You are not seeing the gist of his statements. He gave many logical reasons for controlled demolition and why the official fire induced theory cannot be. You ignored them due to your faith based emotional belief in the infallibility of establishment, demonstrated by your actions. That's NOT skepticism.

[Nostradamus]

I certainly did see the gist of his statements which were vague. He was vague on the thermite. He says it looks like paint, but is not paint. Then he did a straw man argument concerning the paint. The video offers no new information nor does it seek to make any point other than no one cares about his paper - "roaring silence" he calls it.

The biggest evidence he gives in terms of no explosives is that he claims that the so-called thermite could not have brought down the building. He says 100 tones of conventional explosives were in the bulding yet offers nothing more than a broad claim. No where does he explain where the evidence of all of that material is. No explosions due to explosives were heard. No explosion marks on the debris. No timers, fuses, or explosive remains found in the debris.

The video is without content.