9/11 debate on C2C I consulted on for Richard Gage

[Scepcop]

Hi all,
Richard Gage of AE911Truth.org and a team of scientists are scheduled to debate a team of JREF debunkers on the Coast to Coast program in the next few months. Gage has put me on the mailing list after reading my suggestions to him in how to debate the JREF crowd and which points to emphasize, because he would like me to be a consultant to his team. I am honored of course.

Anyhow, there isn't an exact date yet for this debate because when teams of people are involved, it is difficult to coordinate schedules that fit everyone. But I'll keep you all posted if I know any set dates.

Thanks,
Winston

[NinjaPuppy]

CONGRATS!

[caniswalensis]

Sounds like the big leagues! That is exciting, and even as a skeptic, I do not blame you for being honored.

I wish for intellectual clarity for all the participants.

Regards, Canis

[Scepcop]

Hi everyone,
I just got word from Richard Gage that the Coast to Coast debate between his team of scientists and the JREFers about 9/11 will take place on July 31st, sometime in the evening. So please feel free to listen in. I think you can listen in either on your AM radio station or the coast to coast website. http://www.coasttocoastam.com/

On the JREF side, we only know that someone named Dave Thomas will be on it. The rest of his team are unknown at this point. But a possibility is that the infamous Mark Roberts may join them, who is quite an intimidating monster. lol

I spoke to Richard on the phone and gave him some insights and key strategies for exposing the JREFers and their kind.

[ProfWag]

[Scepcop]

[Scepcop]

Check out who Richard Gage and his team will be debating. He seems to have a lot of credentials.

• Mr. Dave Thomas is a physicist and mathematician. He received bachelor degrees in mathematics and in physics, and a master of science in mathematics, from the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, where he was awarded the Brown Medal and the Langmuir Award. Dave is president of the science group New Mexicans for Science and Reason (http://www.nmsr.org), and also is a Fellow of CSI (Committee for Skeptical Inquiry), the publishers of Skeptical Inquirer.

• Other individuals – to be named

[ProfWag]

[really?]

At first glance reading the subject line and the posts and that this debate would be on C to C I dismissed as more pandering to strange unproven ideas and not worth the time to listen too, but after going to the link nmsr.org I see this debate on C to C should be very entertaining.

[ProfWag]

So how's the consulting going Scepcop? Have you been able to help out Mr. Gage?

[Scepcop]

[NinjaPuppy]

New Mexico, the state.

[ProfWag]

But why would you need to worry about content if your theories are solid?

[Scepcop]

[really?]