]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
im talking about DERREN BROWN, THE EVENTS, and the 3nd one is about remote viewing
is called how to be a psychic spy
he does a few tricks but then..
he tested a remote viewer and the remote viewer got pretty cool hits like the ones you are describing eteponge.... lets just said that the professional remote viewer... got "hits"
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogmyCgWrzZw
[/youtube] thats the first part of the videos
Statistics: Posted by ciscop — 26 Nov 2009, 15:15
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
(The target person was in the big building in the upper left)
And here's the best hit I saw in the experiment in the video, that Nostradamus curiously omitted entirely from his critique (maybe because it is an object that won't fit in ANY of the other three target areas, and is sooo specific to the correct target area) ...
Say what you will, but that specific boat could only fit the target area, and the target woman admitted to looking at it a lot while she was there.
And here are the other examples of his past work shown in the video ...
[Target Area]:
[Remote Viewed Drawing]:
[Target Area]:
[Remote Viewed Drawing]:
An interesting one from another video, where he was to remote view a secret soviet location ...
[Target]:
[Remote Viewed Drawing]:
Several Additional Examples from his website:
Those are pretty damn well on target. Obviously got the football stadium place right, and the windmill place.
In one video (the "sub" one I have linked below) he remote viewed a secret soviet factory, and saw they were building a little submarine, with a HUGE submarine next to it, inside the place, which was totally accurate.
Other Videos On Joe McMoneagle And Remote Reviewing:
http://www.lfr.org/LFR/csl/media/videoc ... b/sub.html
http://www.lfr.org/LFR/csl/media/videoc ... stoms.html
http://www.lfr.org/LFR/csl/media/videoc ... atgeo.html
http://www.lfr.org/LFR/csl/media/videoc ... tline.html
Statistics: Posted by Eteponge — 25 Nov 2009, 11:43
]]>
I see it like a person with rare exceptional musical talent. They may crank out a few amazing hit songs in a row on the charts, but then they will have a string of song and album failures (making their success unpredictable), but then every once in awhile crank out some great chart topping hits again, mixed in with some duds.
If you put them to the test, and ask them to write a bunch of big hit songs, some songs might be great hits, others might not do too well, others might be total duds, and anywhere inbetween. Doesn't mean they don't have musical talent, just means they are human.
Statistics: Posted by Eteponge — 25 Nov 2009, 10:03
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>
]]>